Live data from Hacker News

After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

wired.com

41–50 of 108 posts

Re: After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

#41
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't infrared be acceptable for data transmission?

Not sure how applicable it is, but the IrDA (Infrared Data Association) protocol tops out at only 16Mbps.

False.

>GigaIR: 512 Mbit/s – 1 Gbit/s, NRZI, 2-ASK, 4-ASK, 8b/10b

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_Data_Association

Re: After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

#43
post #5

> Modern transistors, which function as a computer’s brain cells Who's the target audience for this analogy? If you understand what a brain cell is then you probably know what a transistor is too. I would bet that more people know what a transistor is than what a brain cell is.

Transistor is the powerhouse of the computer.

Re: After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

#44
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure how applicable it is, but the IrDA (Infrared Data Association) protocol tops out at only 16Mbps.

False. >GigaIR: 512 Mbit/s – 1 Gbit/s, NRZI, 2-ASK, 4-ASK, 8b/10b https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infrared_Data_Association

OK, I wasn't aware of these newer specs, it certainly used to be much more limited.

Re: After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

#48
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't need to know the details of a brain cell to get the analogy. If I say "transistor" to my mom, she wouldn't be able to tell me what it is. If I say "It's like the brain cells for the computer", she would probably understand that "Ah, so a computer has many transistors that helps it think", which seems good enough for an article with a broad audience. > I would bet that more people know what a transistor is t…

A CPU do not think. It follows precise instructions.

And what about a human brain?

Re: After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

#49

On a scale of zero to really big deal. How much of a big deal is this?

Photonic can only be up to 20% faster... And I'm talking about a fully photonic cpu, not an hybrid one that has a light/electricity translation cost.

> Photonic can only be up to 20% faster...

How did you come up with that number? The speed of travel? That's not really the main bottleneck in current computer architectures, at least not yet.

Using photons would enable quite different architectures that we haven't even conceived of yet.

Re: After 50 years of effort, researchers made silicon emit light

#50
Gaaah, please stop advertising optical computers as the technology that will overcome Moore's law. It makes no effing sense.

Wavelength of the light emitted by these devices: ~4000nm

Latest generation commodity CPU transistor structure size: 7nm

Add to that that photons really don't like being trapped; you essentially need a delay line and optical amplifier to hold them indefinitely (that's essentially the core technology my whole PhD thesis centers around), it makes them a really impractical thing to store bits with. Things with a rest mass can be stored easily, though. Things like, say, electrons!

Post reply on HN