More of these in "Signature_example.pdf".
In my opinion, this is a bit childish. But on the other hand, the whole scan-and-sign procedure is also a bit childish if you ask me.
131–140 of 191 posts
More of these in "Signature_example.pdf".
In my opinion, this is a bit childish. But on the other hand, the whole scan-and-sign procedure is also a bit childish if you ask me.
I don't get the magical power of a signature at all. Everybody can write my name under a document. This project basically allows you to forge your own signature. Is it still legally binding? Do these rules even remember the original intent?
You seem to be of the opinion that since it is possible to forge a signature, it cannot be legally binding.
In my organization we have a different problem. We heavily use signed pdf files for all our internal documents - if a document is not signed it's not valid (they are mainly signed with JSignPdf). A number of internal applications need such signed files in order to proceed with a workflow. Checking if a PDF file has been digitally signed, how many signatures are there and if the signatures are all valid is not an easy…
Mac’s pdf viewer Preview has a signature capture feature built in that’s pretty slick. I use it all the time and haven’t encountered an objection. Tbh I’d wonder why you need to fuzz up and fake scan the image. If someone’s requiring that the doc be “signed in ink” or some such, more power to you!
I used Preview for the longest time before they questioned 1 of the documents.
Mac’s pdf viewer Preview has a signature capture feature built in that’s pretty slick. I use it all the time and haven’t encountered an objection. Tbh I’d wonder why you need to fuzz up and fake scan the image. If someone’s requiring that the doc be “signed in ink” or some such, more power to you!
I used that for some mortgage documents (pre-closing) that they could email me, but needed a 'wet' signature. I happened to be out of town so accessing a printer and scanner wasn't easy. I used Preview for the longest time before they questioned 1 of the documents.
I feel that pain. When your only tool is bureaucracy everything looks like a nail. Or something like that.
I once had what I think was a document for a mortgage application refused because I'd printed it, signed it and took a photo on my phone to email back. Apparently it had to be done with a scanner and a camera was unacceptable.
I didn't have a scanner, so I chanced my arm, desaturated and thresholded the image then resubmitted it. I was thanked and it was accepted.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That doesn't work for the US, because any constraints on use are politically unpalatable. Any capability that the government creates thus turns into a security vulnerability to be exploited by business. For example, even just assigning everybody unique identifiers (social security number, drivers' license number) has allowed businesses to demand these identifiers to track customers in privately-held surveillance data…
SSNs are problematic because they are expected to be both public and confidential. In reality, they're public. The federal government refuses to issue actual public IDs, which would solve the problem nicely, for political reasons. They can't retract Social Security.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many people in the USA believe a "national ID" card is the work of actual Satan: https://countdown.org/en/entries/features/national-id-cards-... >These ID cards are, however, preparing the way. The more people get used to some new government regulation, restriction, or provision, the more they tolerate it and eventually just learn to live with it. What may at first seem unthinkable and raise howls of protest, later b…
I think "many" might be overselling it a bit relative to a population of ~330M.