Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good start-up CEOs struggle with this because many of them do care for their employees at a personal level, but they also have an obligation to the owners/investors to be financially successful. And the most findnacially successful CEOs are going to put investors first when they are up against the wall. I assume they rationalize it by saying that if the company is successful that is better in the long run for everyon…
I’m not sure how they’re putting investors first? Maybe they’re putting the employees remaining after the cut first? Of course you can alternatively say to everyone the company will be dead in 3 months, but I’m not sure that’s better.
Shareholders and investors are just a proxy for the business. If you want to use them as an excuse for lay offs - go for it - but realize that 99% of the time the decision comes down to "do I save half by firing the other half, or do we all go down with the ship?".