Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
bitbucket.org
Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
1–10 of 75 posts
Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#2Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#3Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#4Very cool. I’d love to see the same plots scaled by population.
Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#5Very cool. I’d love to see the same plots scaled by population.
I tried, it does not work that way if you think. Or at least your “population” spec should be not arbitrary current administrative region or country, but specific virus spread area, which is very difficult to get data. You’ll get weird absolute numbers for EU minicountries (San Marino and Luxembourg are top) and very different figures per China, Hubei and other regions there. And if you finally compare in graphs you’…
(log y2 - log y1) / (x2 - x1)
Then if we scale y2 and y1 both by c, which is 1 / population:
(log( c * y2 ) - log( c * y1 )) / (x2 - x1) =
(log c + log y2 - log c - log y1) / (x2 - x1) =
(log y2 - log y1) / (x2 - x1)
So scaling by population does not change the slope of the graphs, only the intercept.
Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#6Although even between states the variation in test rate is so great that it's hard to gather much from it.
I personally use hospitalizations as a more accurate metric of total infections in the US. For example, Washington is being hailed as doing a great job to slow the virus down, but ~80% of the confirmed tests result in hospitalizations, because they still just don't test you otherwise [0]. Compare that with a more realistic hospitalization rate (many states with a lot of cases are around 10% -- who would have guessed it would be Louisiana and Florida doing the broad testing?)
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_2020_coronavir...
Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#7Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#8Very cool. I’d love to see the same plots scaled by population.
Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#9Re: Show HN: Log-Scale Covid-19 Plots
#10At least for networking graphs is more meaningful to see difference from the actual from the previous commulative total, than watching the total for a network interface.
Another, at least for me, misleading use of graphs is to show the cummulative total people that ever got sick, instead of the current amount of sick people (taking out the recovered, and maybe the dead ones).
I know that how the measurements are done in most places is rigged, as not everyone is checked, and there are a lot of people that are asymptomatic, but that happens with both the new cases and the cummulative ones. Showing the cummulative numbers don't take out that rigging.