Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
741–750 of 770 posts
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#742Earlier quoted context omitted.
> In many of the newer systems, all those physical dials and switches are just inputs to the computer system which ultimately decides to do what the user is requesting. Even so, a program for processing a switch or dial can be really short and simple. You can print it out on a sheet and check and double check every line of code for to make sure it's correct and all possibilities are accounted for. A program handling…
Mechanical switches and rotary controls require debouncing which is no picnic. I can 100% tell from your comment that you've never had to work with one. It's less science than black magic to avoid double presses or missed presses.
It's the kinda problem that will tend to bite you in the butt if you aren't aware of all the gotchas. Difficulty is they are application specific. But I wouldn't describe the code as particularly complicated.
Most of this stuff a crusty old neckbeard embedded programmer can do half drunk on Friday afternoon.
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#743Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment is off-topic: the article is about physical buttons for non-safety-critical systems. E.g. the article explicitly mentions climate control.
Climate control is something you will want to adjust while driving, so it should be as eyes-free as possible once the basics have been acquired. I can’t think of a car I’ve driven where the climate control was not physical though, that seems pretty insane.
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#744Autocar requires you to disable your ad blocker in order to view the website. Jalopnik does not, and does not even show a GDPR cookie popup.
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#745Look at the cockpit of any modern airliner and you will see screens, but they are never interactive. There are hardware buttons, dials and lights all over the place. A tactile interface is both more obvious, sturdy and more stable, and therefore safer. The problem that touch interfaces solve, ever since the advent of the first smart phone, is that the interface is now dynamic. You can change it without having to repl…
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#746Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#747Earlier quoted context omitted.
You've done a lot of programming for hardware switches and such then? I do some. And the last device we built, we still fight with a simple rotary switch. You have to do things like debounce inputs that seem like obvious binary switches. Getting the debounce windowing right can be just as "guessy". And guess what the highest point of failure on said device is. That selector switch. Had similar experience with buttons…
If anyone else is wondering what debouncing is: https://my.eng.utah.edu/~cs5780/debouncing.pdf
"It’s surprising how many of those derelicts hanging out at the waterfront bars pick an almost random time constant. “The boys ‘n me, we jest figger sumpin like 5 msec”. Shortchanging a real analysis starts even a clean-cut engineer down the slippery slope to the wastrel vagabond’s life."
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#748Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting link. Can anyone explain why a car needs so much code?
I mean ... we all know a car does not need that much code
Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#749Re: Honda bucks industry trend by removing touchscreen controls
#750innovation is wonderful, however sometimes the old ways win out.