Live data from Hacker News

SpaceX bans Zoom over privacy concerns

reuters.com

11–20 of 301 posts

Re: SpaceX bans Zoom over privacy concerns

#11
post #2

I looked into adding Zoom to our Slack workspace this morning, and was beside myself with the set of permissions they requested — reading the contents of every channel and private chat they're included in? For a slash command? That's a hard no. Turned me off the service entirely.

It's only available in the paid version, but slack's video conferencing works pretty well.

For me Slack's video conferencing never really worked that well. Even Google Meet worked better.

Re: SpaceX bans Zoom over privacy concerns

#16
post #2

I looked into adding Zoom to our Slack workspace this morning, and was beside myself with the set of permissions they requested — reading the contents of every channel and private chat they're included in? For a slash command? That's a hard no. Turned me off the service entirely.

It's only available in the paid version, but slack's video conferencing works pretty well.

Ugh ... It sorta works, sure, but doesn't hold a candle to zoom in terms of overall video and audio quality and reliability.

Re: SpaceX bans Zoom over privacy concerns

#17
I'm not Zooming, but everyone I know is, and it looks pretty damn slick and seems to work great. I can't think of any service that has had as fast and huge an adoption, which is obviously due to blind luck/things beyond their control (no one saw global apocalypse coming and hoping for such would be a horrible business plan).

Of course there's been other services working just as well or better for at least 10 years now. Interesting things converged suddenly on Zoom. I guess full cross-platform support was the key? Also interesting is the deluge of anti-zoom articles that are blanketing the cybersphere :-) just as they are getting traction. Jealous rivals? Disgruntled lovers?

Re: SpaceX bans Zoom over privacy concerns

#19
post #4

The fact that they show end users (no pun intended) an "end-to-end encrypted" badge on the meeting window itself, and elsewhere explain how a Zoom server (not Zoom client) is what constitutes an "end" despite the whole rest of the electronic communication industry using "end-to-end" to refer exclusively to user agents, is bonkers.

Agreed. It's unlikely they stumbled onto an industry standard phrase like that alone, then innocently used it without knowing the generally accepted meaning. This is deceptive advertising.

Re: SpaceX bans Zoom over privacy concerns

#20

I've found Hangouts to be equal in call quality to Zoom, and it runs entirely in the web browser. The only down side is it consumes a LOT of power, so you need to stay plugged in while you use it.

Also can't have too many attendees

You can have 200, and you can also live-stream large meetings. It is a bit weird that you have to split the stream, but it's worked great for us doing ~300 person all-hands meetings.
Post reply on HN