Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I remember a few years ago Apple bought a fantastic public transit app (Embark?), shut it down and I still don’t think their Maps app comes close to the original transit app. When Edwin Howard Armstrong invented FM radio, he was working for RCA, which had everything invested in AM radio, an incompatible technology. RCA chose not to invest, and used their political clout to lobby the FCC to cripple FM radio, and the…
> For companies like Apple, these acquisitions are more about killing competition This is just nonsense. Every acquisition they've ever done can directly be seen in future projects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mergers_and_acquisitio... The products you don't see give a hint into their roadmap.
Apple acquires Dark Sky
421–430 of 594 posts
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#422Earlier quoted context omitted.
If shuts down the 1M+ (less than 5M) Google[1] accounts and then this weather app becomes the default system backing Siri, there will be a lot more users than the Google Play store users Dark Sky is losing. Right now, Apple's weather is backed by Yahoo! so my guess is that Yahoo! is going away and all 1 billion devices will now be using Dark Sky. [1] - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.darksky.da.…
Wait, so HN normally filters the more odd Unicode characters, but does not filter codes from the Private Use Area? Note: Since this is the Private Use area, the character you used does not display the same on every device. In my browswer, it displays as a box containing “F8FF”; if I copy it to a nearby terminal window, it shows up as “(t)”. According to the ConScript (…
The area also contains the Ubuntu icon as well as the Ubuntu word logo, and a bunch of assorted text symbols (numbers, fractions, accents, arrows, etc.).
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#423Earlier quoted context omitted.
This was like the one Android app I paid for. Ugh. Also super annoyed.
You are exactly the reason why companies like Dark Sky can be bought by Apple: you have only ever paid for one Android app. That does not make a vibrant app economy.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#424I'm sending an email to tell them how disappointed I feel as a long-time subscriber about them maliciously (since there is no other more generous explanation) shutting down the service for Android users: https://darksky.net/contact
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#425Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#426Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#427Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can always come up with a ludicrous policy; it doesn't detract from the potential of regulation. Would you accept General Motors buying freeways and not allowing others' platforms on it? Competition must be regulated. Also, isn't the barrier between iOS and Android devices artificial? I don't see a veritable technical reason why the two platforms can't be compatible.
> Also, isn't the barrier between iOS and Android devices artificial? No, not even remotely. They are completely different operating systems.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#428Earlier quoted context omitted.
E^3 model[0], different parameters. [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extingu...
I mean in Epic's case, its really more like movie/tv/book deals, except with much more favourable terms to the creators.
That is in the case of Epic not the OP.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#429Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I remember a few years ago Apple bought a fantastic public transit app (Embark?), shut it down and I still don’t think their Maps app comes close to the original transit app. When Edwin Howard Armstrong invented FM radio, he was working for RCA, which had everything invested in AM radio, an incompatible technology. RCA chose not to invest, and used their political clout to lobby the FCC to cripple FM radio, and the…
I don't know. How's Dark Sky competing with Apple? I don't think they derive much, if any, revenue from the Weather app. More likely they're paying for the data.
Re: Apple acquires Dark Sky
#430Earlier quoted context omitted.
Dark Sky (formerly forecast.io)'s entire point was that they, unlike most weather apps, aren't just a prettified version of publicly available weather data. Dark Sky's selling point was that they also used crowdsourced data, including user reports of rain and IIRC data from app user's sensors in their phones, to predict "hyperlocal" weather. I use Dark Sky and it is typically much much more accurate than other weathe…
On the other hand, if they integrate it into iOS's default weather app, that would open up a whole trove of walking sensors. And potentially make it the most accurate forecasting service by far.