If you’re wondering if STIR/SHAKEN was a James Bond reference, the answer is yes, and SHAKEN stands for “Signature-based Handling of Asserted information using toKENs”
Backronym writing is a real gift.
FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
11–20 of 352 posts
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#12Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#13Is this going to impact PBX systems that use ANI Information Elements to route calls and provide caller information to customer service applications, etc? Spoofing is kind of at the heart of those things.
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#14Is this going to impact PBX systems that use ANI Information Elements to route calls and provide caller information to customer service applications, etc? Spoofing is kind of at the heart of those things.
The legitimate use case is basically: I am placing this outbound call over VOIP or a different phone line, but I want this ANI to show up on the callee's phone, so when they call back they go to the correct line (dentist's desk, software sales line, whatever)
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#15Does this mean I can start answering my phone again? Are there other vectors for spam calling which are not addressed by this solution?
After 15 years of cell phone spam, anything that shows up as a number on my personal phone, and not a contact, is reflexively ignored. I don't think I'll ever shake this habit: if it is important, they will leave a message.
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#16Knowing a number is legitimate is great, going after scammers and those that support them is better.
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#17Does this mean I can start answering my phone again? Are there other vectors for spam calling which are not addressed by this solution?
After 15 years of cell phone spam, anything that shows up as a number on my personal phone, and not a contact, is reflexively ignored. I don't think I'll ever shake this habit: if it is important, they will leave a message.
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
After 15 years of cell phone spam, anything that shows up as a number on my personal phone, and not a contact, is reflexively ignored. I don't think I'll ever shake this habit: if it is important, they will leave a message.
I'm struggling with the decision of whether to automatically block anyone not in my contact list and leave a message in my voicemail explaining why. Don't want to be unfriendly, but it's only getting more ridiculous.
Re: FCC will require phone carriers to authenticate calls by June 2021 [pdf]
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
After 15 years of cell phone spam, anything that shows up as a number on my personal phone, and not a contact, is reflexively ignored. I don't think I'll ever shake this habit: if it is important, they will leave a message.
I'm struggling with the decision of whether to automatically block anyone not in my contact list and leave a message in my voicemail explaining why. Don't want to be unfriendly, but it's only getting more ridiculous.
It only bit me once in several years - I was expecting a call-back from a doctor and they weren't in my contacts. Missed their call, which caused a several hour delay and some annoyance (thankfully not for something critical).