Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the idea is that you're supposed to build a system to manage WireGuard using that sort of information. I.e. WireGuard provides the basic primitives and second- or third-party tooling uses them. I like that idea, because it means that the actual WireGuard core is small and it's usable right now. It is annoying that someone hasn't yet developed neat integrations for WireGuard and stuff I might want to use, but…
Yep, that's what I'm asking for... right now wireguard can only look at configuration text files AFAIK. If it had a way to invoke a command/script to lookup a key/ip, any number of external management systems could be created!
WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
121–130 of 214 posts
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#122For anyone wanting to try it, WireGuard with Algo VPN [1] to set it up on a server is a great combination. I found it quite easy to setup and use. Algo has built-in support for various cloud providers, where, when you run it from, day, your desktop, it can setup the VPN server for you based on answers to some questions (with sensible defaults) and some information on connecting to the provider (like an API key, for e…
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#123For anyone wanting to try it, WireGuard with Algo VPN [1] to set it up on a server is a great combination. I found it quite easy to setup and use. Algo has built-in support for various cloud providers, where, when you run it from, day, your desktop, it can setup the VPN server for you based on answers to some questions (with sensible defaults) and some information on connecting to the provider (like an API key, for e…
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
Good point. AES hardware acceleration makes a massive difference. It's why ZeroTier 2.x will use AES. Tiny boxes that lack HW acceleration are generally not used in cases where they're pushing enough bandwidth to matter anyway.
No, but boxes who lack hardware acceleration might care about battery life.
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#125I recently setup WireGuard on my new dedicated server and it is amazingly easier compared to OpenVPN. I've setup several site-to-site and client-to-site VPNs on OpenVPN so maybe I'm just use to all the iptables/route gotchas, but not needing to do the whole CA/easyrsa stuff is a huge bonus. I like how their official tutorial video shows all the raw ip commands and then shows their wg-quick configuration script. That…
That's good to hear, but how does it handle authentication / authorization?
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#126I recently setup WireGuard on my new dedicated server and it is amazingly easier compared to OpenVPN. I've setup several site-to-site and client-to-site VPNs on OpenVPN so maybe I'm just use to all the iptables/route gotchas, but not needing to do the whole CA/easyrsa stuff is a huge bonus. I like how their official tutorial video shows all the raw ip commands and then shows their wg-quick configuration script. That…
> not needing to do the whole CA/easyrsa stuff is a huge bonus That's good to hear, but how does it handle authentication / authorization?
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#127Could go very far with trivial functionality, such as listing, adding, removing users and download a config file/qr-code.
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seems like a very long shot to make it into Apple products both because of the license and the fact it wasn’t invented in Cupertino. FWIW the userspace implementations are quite good, and still out performs IPSec.
I don't think there license would be a problem, as it's GPLv2, not v3. But the 'not invented here' syndrome is very real.
Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#129Re: WireGuard 1.0 for Linux 5.6
#130Does anyone know of a decent bash-script (or even self-hosted page) that one could use to administer wireguard? Could go very far with trivial functionality, such as listing, adding, removing users and download a config file/qr-code.
[1] https://github.com/pivpn/pivpn/tree/master/scripts/wireguard