Live data from Hacker News

Linux 5.6

lore.kernel.org

21–30 of 153 posts

Re: Linux 5.6

#21
post #3

I'm just a kernel newbie looking at small issues in my free time, but seeing my name in the shortlog feels very rewarding.

"For Every Bloke Who Makes His Mark, There's Half A Dozen Waiting To Rub It Out" -- Andy Capp

Congrats on being in the former group. When (not if) apes from the latter come to mess you around, tell them to get stuffed.

(edit: typo)

Re: Linux 5.6

#22
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> in my free time Thank you! To make it even more rewarding for you :) - I remember there was a report mentioning that most of the work on Linux kernel nowadays is done by salaried employees.

> most of the work on Linux kernel nowadays is done by salaried employees. That's been the case for decades, probably since just after Linus released it.

Why is that probably? What makes it probable?

Re: Linux 5.6

#23
Linux 5.6 is getting Wireguard, Linux 5.7 will be getting exfat. It's a great year for the kernel.

Re: Linux 5.6

#24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> most of the work on Linux kernel nowadays is done by salaried employees. That's been the case for decades, probably since just after Linus released it.

Why is that probably? What makes it probable?

Because if you're a competent enough programmer to contribute to the Linux kernel, you're probably competent enough to get a job as a programmer.

Re: Linux 5.6

#26
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> most of the work on Linux kernel nowadays is done by salaried employees. That's been the case for decades, probably since just after Linus released it.

Why is that probably? What makes it probable?

I think a straight 'no' suffices. Linux most definetly wasn't a commercial project in the early years.

Re: Linux 5.6

#28
post #24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why is that probably? What makes it probable?

Because if you're a competent enough programmer to contribute to the Linux kernel, you're probably competent enough to get a job as a programmer.

I believe that by "salaried employees" it was meant as "people that have linux kernel programming" in the job description.

Re: Linux 5.6

#29
post #16

While announcing Linux 5.6 is relevant to HN, the particular mailing list message regards differences from a previous release candidate. Can someone please explain, in layperson's terms, what has changed from Linux 5.5 (or 5.4) to 5.6?

https://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges this wiki page currently covers 5.5 but should be updated to 5.6 in the coming days.

The version-specific pages are available in draft form before the main one gets updated: https://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_5.6

Re: Linux 5.6

#30
post #23

Linux 5.6 is getting Wireguard, Linux 5.7 will be getting exfat. It's a great year for the kernel.

What is special about exfat? I see it’s a variant of FAT32 that allows for more than 4GB, and is mainly for creating USBs? Does this mean it will improve interop with Windows?
Post reply on HN