Live data from Hacker News

Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

zdnet.com

201–210 of 275 posts

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#201
post #166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>does Disney+ run on Azure? Some cursory web searching suggests that at least as of 2017, BAMTECH / Disney were using AWS as their public cloud provider. There's enough inertia here that you'd imagine that this is still the case.

Disney+ runs on AWS

Can confirm (or back up sels statement).

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#202
post #143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> prioritize those usages that will deal with and help lessen the crisis Who is responsible for that decision? Do they become a bottleneck? Might they make mistakes? Are they susceptible to corruption? If so, it may be more wise to distribute that decision-making... via the market system.

The market system has, so far, benefited hoarders to the detriment of health care providers that need it more. Under normal circumstances, the market system would be just fine. In a crisis, something else is needed on top of normal market forces, which may still play a part for whatever resources are left after they reach those that truly need it. As for who is responsible for that decision, it's a role the governmen…

I think the point is that if you let prices rise people wouldn't hoard as much. Prices go up demand goes down. High prices also encourage hoarders to sell or other suppliers to come on line, eventually lowering the price for everyone. Government atempts to keep prices low with ill defined and vague "price gouging" laws is a form of price control which while popular never work and result in shortages. This is clearly seen in U.S. gasoline prices. In the 70s when the oil supply was threatened the answer was price controls that led to rationing and shortages. In the 2000s in the U.S. prices quickly climbed from about a $1 a gallon to $4 a gallon or more because of overseas political turmoil and war. Unlike the 70s, prices were allowed to rise, resulting in no shortages, reduced demand as people switched to more efficient cars and other conservation methods, and eventually much more supply as producers were empowered and encouraged by high prices to spend money to explore fracking and other methods leading to the glut of oil and lower prices we have now. Price controls even in a crisis never work and lead to shortages and inefficient behaviors like hoarding or waste.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/03/coronavirus-there-is-...

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't you be within the law if you simply sold the rolls at your own cost, or even your cost plus 10%, rather than trying to turn a large profit from them?

You could give them to your friend(s) if you have any. Or try freecycle. It's not difficult once you realize that if you actually care about waste, then you don't have to profit.

This is absolutely true, of course. I should probably have added "or you can just, you know, give somebody a roll or two of toilet paper." :)

I plan to risk technically violating the "shelter at home" guidelines to bring a 6-ounce bottle of hand sanitizer to a friend in a different city next weekend, assuming my order actually arrives. (It's a little crazy that the stuff is virtually currency at this point.)

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#204
post #187

Earlier quoted context omitted.

High prices encourage people like me who have more than enough to get off their asses and share the excess. There is already plenty of TP in existence in the country for everyone, it’s just poorly distributed because the gov has removed the incentive for the TP-haves to distribute it better towards the TP-have-nots. Or, more to the point of the article, there is no incentive for someone with a useless side project to…

But it was the high price of the stuff that made the people who require "incentives" grab it. It's circular, like a stock market bubble. First people panic and buy, then other people buy because the price is going up, it's absurd to say that price represents some fundamental truth. When I went to the grocery store a week ago, there were a lot of things, just not toilet paper. If the laws against price gouging are cau…

It's the artificially low prices of the big stores that encourage hoarding and aldo middle men to get in the act and buy it up to profit. Raise the prices and people won't hoard and you eliminate the opportunity for price arbitrage when speculators take advantage of the artificially low prices in the store to sell on the open market to the highest bidder. If prices rise across the board the supply will meet demand and there will be no room for price arbitrage which only appears in dysfunctional markets where prices are artificially set and are not allowed to float.

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#205

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Opportunity cost is everything you choose to forgo when you choose to allocate any resources to anything. If supply and demand is allowed to have its normal influence on price, then you can decide what you actually have the most demand for, and allocate your resources accordingly. The decisions you make regarding your own needs are always going to be much more efficient than those that any rationing authority could e…

> The decisions you make regarding your own needs are always going to be much more efficient than those that any rationing authority could ever make. If that were true, then hoarding wouldn't happen in the first place. You're obviously wrong here, and there's abundant evidence that consumers don't always make the best choices for themselves. Try scaling back your claims to something less absolute.

The hoarders benefit massively from hoarding. They benefit from a regulation that prevents the markets from responding to shortages and spikes in demand. They have no problem whatsoever deciding how to allocate their resources in that situation, which is the entire problem, because the market doesn’t force them to.

An individual will always, every single time, without fail, know what they need better than a 3rd party who nominates themselves to make decisions on behalf of others. If you remove market forces from the situation, and establish an authority to decide who gets rationed what, it will always impact the efficiency of those resource allocation decisions.

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#206
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apparently Team usage is up significantly. You can do video conferencing via Team which is one aspect that is quite different from Slack. I imagine there are some new use cases arising from that.

We had started tentatively using teams before all this. Now it's a critical part of our day-to-day functioning and you know what? It's not bad, not bad at all. It's pretty well thought out, reliable, integrated with Outlook and Sharepoint. Even the few people who complained that they wouldn't use it because there wasn't a phone number to call for telecons were overcome when we told them to just install the app and jo…

Same experience here, my company was unable to choose a collaborative software, but in just one day 250 people had to work remotly while none before.

Teams is somewhat good, good tools to create wikis and integrate third party solution like Jira and office integration. One selling point to me is that "it just works" even with non technical users.

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#208
post #88

Office365 and AzureAD has been even more unreliable than usual over the past week or so, plenty of "an error has occurred" pages and delayed mail - as usually Microsoft didn't update the status dashboards (the ones you can see without being able to log in anyway), The other client I work with uses GCP and Google Mail/Docs for business which I haven't noticed any issues with.

GSuite and GCP had impactful outages for us this past week and were listed on the status dashboards.

Looks like you are repeating the same comment everywhere without linking at what kind of outages GCP had.

Disc: Googler

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#209

Time to buy MS stock.

The same kind of thinking sent the stock market shooting up when some 3 million people filed for unemployment claims last week.

"Phew! Now that its priced in, let us focus on putting our $2 trillion to work"

Re: Microsoft: Cloud services demand up, prioritization rules in place

#210

It would be interesting to know how many standard deviations is 775% extra demand from the norm. More than six standard deviations is rarer than a 1 in 506797346 event.

Samples getting 6 standard deviations away from the mean can happen 1/6² ≈ 2.7% of the time. You might be assuming properties of the distribution that aren't true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chebyshev%27s_inequality

Post reply on HN