Warren needs to give his employees a raise.
https://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/wages-vs-corporate-prof...
61–70 of 70 posts
Warren needs to give his employees a raise.
https://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/wages-vs-corporate-prof...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
75% of Gates Foundation's money end's up in big four consulting firms, which by gates himself do a better work at deploying money than other more rational actors like local governments or communities. So yeah, prob that's not charity too... it's just a way to get the maximum available tax cut, you donate to your own or your friends charity and he or she funnels backs the money where you need it to be.
Source? Just looking at the annual letter, they're out there doing good things in third world health impact.
"How we got here: The Gates Foundation believes in consultants"
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At the level Berkshire operates at the calculation is different from generically investing in the market. Buffet buys companies, or big chunks of them, so what matters is the risk profile and liquidity of the individual company. Also when he buys by definition he will create the bottom price of the stock. Him buying will make it go up, so he can’t wait until the price hits bottom, he waits until he has the best buyin…
Okay since you opened the door to playing "call the bottom" where do you think it will be? I'll swag first. The end will be in sight when the US new case rate hits its inflection point and begins decreasing. From that you can sorta tell when things will settle down biology-wise.
They really need to tax this man, he's even on record saying how he needs to be taxed more.
Billionares say things like that all the time but that's just for publicity. Truth is, if he really wanted to be taxed more, he could. There's no need to change any laws for that. His Berkshire Hathaway is already claiming a lot of tax breaks to lower their tax liabilities - if he wants to contribute more to federal budget he just needs to stop doing that :) After all, claiming a tax break is a privilege, it's not ma…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Insurance doesn't normally cover pandemics.
Insurance covers insurable events, some of them may be triggered by a pandemic, and some of those might be excluded. Check your fine print. * Life insurance is probably going to take a hit. My life insurance doesn't mention pandemic or acts of god. Suicide yes. Pandemic no. * Auto insurance is probably going to be marginally more profitable as miles driven drop. * Home/Property isn't likely to be heavily affected. *…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Berkshire has almost all of their cash in short term treasury bills. It's a cash equivalent, because you don't want to keep 100bn in a checking account, and it does get hurt by inflation. But that's OK, because making a purchase when the time is right will more than make up for it. Cash is still king, in Buffet's world.
I'd just add that in addition to that $128B in liquid Treasury securities (which is what "cash" means when we talk about such large amounts) they also have about $103B debt that cancels their net cash-debt position to about $25B. The debt has long maturity, though, so most of the cash can be deployed immediately. Also, Buffett applies something like the Taleb's "barbell method" to his holdings: he never buys high gra…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Billionares say things like that all the time but that's just for publicity. Truth is, if he really wanted to be taxed more, he could. There's no need to change any laws for that. His Berkshire Hathaway is already claiming a lot of tax breaks to lower their tax liabilities - if he wants to contribute more to federal budget he just needs to stop doing that :) After all, claiming a tax break is a privilege, it's not ma…
Berkshire Hathaway is not 100% owned by Buffett. He wants people with his personal level of wealth to be taxed more.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> My life insurance doesn't mention pandemic or acts of god. Suicide yes. Pandemic no. I'd be pretty surprised if this wasn't true. Who's taking out life insurance exclusively for predictable causes of death? You don't insure those, you avoid them. "Acts of god" are most of the reason you'd want life insurance in the first place.
Exclusively? No. But I think suicide is covered on some policies after a waiting period.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see how that can be the case. Here's the data from DC on the Flu https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html Over the past decade a low season of 140,000 hospitalizations to a high of 810,000. For this to be 20x worse you'd need each stay from the flu to be 1 day and each for COVID-19 to be 20, and then we'd need to reach somewhere between 700,000 - 4,000,000 positive COVID-19 cases in the U.S. und…
We had 500 deaths yesterday. We’re doubling ever 2-3 days. I’ll take 3 days. At the end of next week, we’ll have 2000 deaths a day. At the end of two weeks, we’ll have almost 10,000. We’ll have 200k dead in roughly three weeks.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see how that can be the case. Here's the data from DC on the Flu https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/past-seasons.html Over the past decade a low season of 140,000 hospitalizations to a high of 810,000. For this to be 20x worse you'd need each stay from the flu to be 1 day and each for COVID-19 to be 20, and then we'd need to reach somewhere between 700,000 - 4,000,000 positive COVID-19 cases in the U.S. und…
We had 500 deaths yesterday. We’re doubling ever 2-3 days. I’ll take 3 days. At the end of next week, we’ll have 2000 deaths a day. At the end of two weeks, we’ll have almost 10,000. We’ll have 200k dead in roughly three weeks.
I'm not suggesting COVID-19 isn't bad, it just isn't 20x flu bad with the mitigation we have in place.
We won't really understand the statistics on this until a year or more out when analysis of all the death certificates come in and we can look at how 2020 is different, i.e. for each COVID-19 how many fewer flu deaths did we have? etc.