AWS Ground Station
21–30 of 184 posts
Re: AWS Ground Station
#22Then again, the more I think about it, the more this makes sense. Satellite business is hard and capital intensive enough as it is, for starters in the micro-satellite business it would be absolutely prohibitive to run their own hardware just to receive those signals.
Re: AWS Ground Station
#23Honestly, this is simply sci-fi to me. The fact that we have companies providing satellite communication infrastructure, just extremely futuristic. Am I just too slow with the catching up?
Re: AWS Ground Station
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Here to help! Sign up a contract with us, and we'll give you a satellite to rent.
who are you?
Re: AWS Ground Station
#25> You can use radar satellite imagery of your various business facilities such as parking lots, logistic centers, and retail stores Could this be used to monitor someone's home?
(With more satellites you can get more frequent coverage of course.)
Radar of course is weatherproof but again the cost is ridiculous unless you are a government or Exxon.
Re: AWS Ground Station
#26Re: AWS Ground Station
#27Re: AWS Ground Station
#28Re: AWS Ground Station
#29Re: AWS Ground Station
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surveillance satellites aren't normally in geostationary orbits either, as that's too far away for the optics. Your deltav comment alludes to it. They seem to be into highly elliptical orbits.
You would need an insane amount of LEO satellites in order to get a feed which was continuous. I don't even know how to start doing the maths on this one.
Thanks to Trump's inability to not tweet anything he sees, we know that Block 4 KH-11 satellites have a 10cm/pixel about standard (they're in an elliptical orbit, but they use which ever is closest at the time). So we're looking at a 10M/pixel in geostationary orbit, assuming you can get the same optics that NROL was shipping up as late as 2013.