RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#2until RSA hopefully fixes the flaw
I cannot comprehend the confusion of ideas necessary to generate this phrase.
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#3Can't you find a real link next time, instead of this content-free blogspam? Here, I did it for you:
http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~valeria/research/publications/DAT...
By the way, this is from a year ago.
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#4[deleted]
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#5Can't you find a real link next time, instead of this content-free blogspam? Here, I did it for you: http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~valeria/research/publications/DAT... By the way, this is from a year ago.
A link to a PDF of a research document with an obtuse abstract, versus a quick, readable summary published on one of the industry's leading tech publications?
I'll take the latter, thank you.
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#6Can't you find a real link next time, instead of this content-free blogspam? Here, I did it for you: http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~valeria/research/publications/DAT... By the way, this is from a year ago.
A link to a PDF of a research document with an obtuse abstract, versus a quick, readable summary published on one of the industry's leading tech publications? I'll take the latter, thank you.
> industry's leading tech publications
I hope you're joking. Sometimes, sure, they're good. But that article is ... I'll hold my tongue. They're making it out to be some amazing feat. While I don't want to take away from the authors who I'm sure are great researchers, this is nothing new. And then there's the part where they suggest RSA fix it, and that's just something else.
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#7Can't you find a real link next time, instead of this content-free blogspam? Here, I did it for you: http://www.eecs.umich.edu/~valeria/research/publications/DAT... By the way, this is from a year ago.
A link to a PDF of a research document with an obtuse abstract, versus a quick, readable summary published on one of the industry's leading tech publications? I'll take the latter, thank you.
Well, suit yourself. I'll take the former.
Hopefully RSA will publish their own summary of this attack ;)
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
A link to a PDF of a research document with an obtuse abstract, versus a quick, readable summary published on one of the industry's leading tech publications? I'll take the latter, thank you.
> industry's leading tech publications I hope you're joking. Sometimes, sure, they're good. But that article is ... I'll hold my tongue. They're making it out to be some amazing feat. While I don't want to take away from the authors who I'm sure are great researchers, this is nothing new. And then there's the part where they suggest RSA fix it, and that's just something else.
It is one of the industry's leading tech publications: http://www.techmeme.com/lb ... though I do agree, this article is pretty crappy, as some others have pointed out.
I mostly just disagree with the parent's assertion that a short summary of a research paper posted on a major publication qualifies as "blog spam" or that the original poster had some kind of obligation to track down the source paper. Sometimes a tl;dr version is just what the doctor ordered.
Re: RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity
#9If you have physical access to the server, it's already screwed. This is hardly "cracking" RSA encryption.