U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
1–10 of 240 posts
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#2Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#3Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#4Corporations should keep paying to entities who don't have as much wealth as them. For some people who aren't extraordinarily rich, it maybe their only source of income.
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#5Corporations should keep paying to entities who don't have as much wealth as them. For some people who aren't extraordinarily rich, it maybe their only source of income.
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#6Off topic: @JumpCrisscross I love these economic related posts you continually submit, please continue!
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#7Corporations should keep paying to entities who don't have as much wealth as them. For some people who aren't extraordinarily rich, it maybe their only source of income.
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#8I'm imaging a lot of businesses were barely scraping by before the shelter-in-place.
We might see a huge increase in empty storefronts after this passes.
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#9Corporations should keep paying to entities who don't have as much wealth as them. For some people who aren't extraordinarily rich, it maybe their only source of income.
Re: U.S. retailers plan to stop paying rent to offset virus closures
#10Corporations should keep paying to entities who don't have as much wealth as them. For some people who aren't extraordinarily rich, it maybe their only source of income.
I do agree with your sentiment. Paying their workers who are probably struggling significantly at the moment would be ideal. I don't feel that landlords need the $'s as much as those workers.