Live data from Hacker News

The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

england.nhs.uk

41–50 of 161 posts

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#41

Would it be safer for people who has recovered to volunteer?

Don't quote me on this and I don't have a peer-reviewed paper as source, but as far as I know, people can get reinfected after being infected once.

We don't know that yet, but so far that seems unlikely.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2020/03/20/8190384...

https://www.genengnews.com/news/covid-19-reinfection-not-a-c...

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#42
post #35
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anyone disputing this comment has covid, pass it on.

What source do you have that confirms this? Everything I've read says it is not yet determined if this is the case.

I believe you can get reinfected with a different strain of the same virus. Not the one you initially got infected with though.

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#43
post #9

How does one find out if they are an at risk group? Edit> I’m asking. See if I can volunteer to help

They have almost all received a text message by now. (A few are being reached by other means.) I know a couple of people that have received them, they’re pretty serious.

A couple of my family members received letters 2 days ago, saying they are to stay at home for 12 weeks. That's in Scotland though, so things might differ elsewhere in the UK.

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#44

Wouldn’t it be more appropriate just to hire people and set them to work in the NHS? It’s way past time the government stopped messing around and just hired all the spare labour - which can then be directed to assist the NHS or directed to stay at home as required. When there are so many people without work that want it we need to stop QE’ing Gilts and start QE’ing workers hours instead. All this could be done with a…

I agree with everything here except the reference to QE. Quantitative Easing works to control the money supply only because the central bank can quickly mop the money back up by selling the bonds it previously bought. The central bank can't mop up money it sent to people as wages, so if inflation started, they would have no leverage.

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#45
post #30

Taiwan, which has one of the best medical systems in the world, is heavily reliant on civil society -- which is many things, but one of which is heavy participation by unpaid volunteers. Social capital is a real thing and a valuable thing.

One of the problems the UK has is that "The Big Society" was used as a political punchline for the best part of the last decade.

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

During my brief visit to the Midlands many years ago, the U.K. seems to have a community cohesion that we don’t have much in the US (many rescue services are non profit and operate exclusively with volunteers for example). They will benefit from it through efforts such as this.

> the U.K. seems to have a community cohesion that we don’t have much in the US (many rescue services are non profit and operate exclusively with volunteers for example) Counter-example: I thought the majority of fire and rescue people in the US were volunteers? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volunteer_fire_department#Unit...

It’s a good point, but quite a bit of the US population lives in urban areas, no? Which is going to overlap with where quite a bit of healthcare system strain might occur, making volunteers necessary.

Will citizens heed the call? To be determined.

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#47

Wouldn’t it be more appropriate just to hire people and set them to work in the NHS? It’s way past time the government stopped messing around and just hired all the spare labour - which can then be directed to assist the NHS or directed to stay at home as required. When there are so many people without work that want it we need to stop QE’ing Gilts and start QE’ing workers hours instead. All this could be done with a…

People who don't want any money often provide the best service (and in this case will most likely also have the lowest likelihood of carrying the virus).

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#48

Wouldn’t it be more appropriate just to hire people and set them to work in the NHS? It’s way past time the government stopped messing around and just hired all the spare labour - which can then be directed to assist the NHS or directed to stay at home as required. When there are so many people without work that want it we need to stop QE’ing Gilts and start QE’ing workers hours instead. All this could be done with a…

> “Pay people and they spend it - keeping the economic circulation ticking over.”

There isn’t actually much to spend it on right now, other than rent, groceries, and online entertainment. Everything else is closed and my bank balance is actually looking much more healthy than it normally would this far into the month!

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#49
Seems like a nice positive way for people to feel useful and lend a helping hand.

The headfake could be that this leads to an improvement to the health and well-being of the 250k volunteers some of whom might otherwise suffer from feelings of loneliness and helplessness

Re: The NHS is looking for up to 250k volunteers

#50

Would it be safer for people who has recovered to volunteer?

There isn’t yet a test to say with certainty if you’ve had Covid-19. (EDIT: its coming, but isn’t available yet)

I’m fairly sure I had it, but can’t be 100% certain until the test for antibodies is available.

Post reply on HN