Live data from Hacker News

OneWeb successfully launches 34 more satellites into orbit

oneweb.world

51–55 of 55 posts

Re: OneWeb successfully launches 34 more satellites into orbit

#51
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The satellite would not be passing through the shot for the entire exposure. If you had software to detect and delete frames with a satellite moving through them, how many frames from a multi-hour exposure would have to be deleted? I assume it can even be done digitally in post-production, but even if you had to actually close the aperture ahead of the satellite crossing through your frame, we know exactly where the…

We studied this technique in the graduate-level observation class I took 30 years ago. It is not trivial for a lot of reasons, especially for modern wide-field telescopes with multiple satellites in the field of view at all times.

You had digital sensors thirty years ago?

Re: OneWeb successfully launches 34 more satellites into orbit

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We studied this technique in the graduate-level observation class I took 30 years ago. It is not trivial for a lot of reasons, especially for modern wide-field telescopes with multiple satellites in the field of view at all times.

You had digital sensors thirty years ago?

Yes. In the case of the system I used in class, it was a CCD intended for a TV camera, hence pretty low resolution. Pre-HD. But this was something appropriate for a one meter telescope, not a big one.

Re: OneWeb successfully launches 34 more satellites into orbit

#53
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks like you've never done astronomy. A single satellite passing through the shot can saturate the sensor and ruin a multi hour exposure.

The satellite would not be passing through the shot for the entire exposure. If you had software to detect and delete frames with a satellite moving through them, how many frames from a multi-hour exposure would have to be deleted? I assume it can even be done digitally in post-production, but even if you had to actually close the aperture ahead of the satellite crossing through your frame, we know exactly where the…

Er . . .

A long exposure isn't the same as frame stacking. It isn't taking a traditional video and stacking the frames. Even if a shot is made out of stacked frames, each frame may be 5+ minutes of exposure, enough time for the chance of it being ruined by a satellite to be very high.

Re: OneWeb successfully launches 34 more satellites into orbit

#54
post #2

between this and Elon's stuff, how long till it is impossible to do astronomy or safely launch anything into space?

They are mostly a problem at sunrise and sunset when they catch the sun and reflect it. Astronomy isn't much good then anyway.

How am I getting downvoted? How can satellites reflect the sun when they are in shadow?

And who is pointing their telescope up at sunrise? No one!

Re: OneWeb successfully launches 34 more satellites into orbit

#55
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Spreading FUD. Spacex has the most advanced satellite management and deorbiting systems ever made. Fully approved by the fcc.

Do you have any details about this? As an amateur astronomer I am concerned about increased number of objects in orbit and their eventual fate. How the quality of deorbiting system measured? Have they deorbited any yet and their success rate is higher than others? Also I had no idea FCC approves satellite guidance systems, I thought they mostly supervise radio spectrum.

I came across this. Someone tried to put the facts together from original sources. If you read the links report back. I’d be curious what your opinions are.

https://pay.reddit.com/r/spacex/comments/fc9rqq/rspacex_disc...

Post reply on HN