I'm curious as to how many people use FTP in the browser?
Firmwares, drivers, distro isos, tarballs are traditionally distributed on (anonymous) ftp. Given that such downloads should be authenticated using ftp is non-ideal though, I guess.
Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
41–50 of 86 posts
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#42I love discussions about browsers on Hacker News! They're amazing. Half the people ranting how some insanely complicated technical decision is going to ruin the world, the other half yelling at them that this is necessary, others ranting about how the vendor is evil for some reason, etc. Just lovely!
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#43Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#44Are there security issues with FTP, or do people just not use it enough because HTTP supplants it? I haven't used FTP in a while to download files.
For sure it is unencrypted, so it is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.
An unencrypted connection (such as plain old FTP) is effectively a broadcast. No attack, MITM or otherwise, is required. Eve just has to listen.
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#45Are there security issues with FTP, or do people just not use it enough because HTTP supplants it? I haven't used FTP in a while to download files.
Well it reeks a bit because from the article "Mozilla could have opted for implementing support for secure FTP in Firefox; a bug was filed 19 years ago to introduce support for SFTP in Firefox but nothing ever came out of it."
FTP made some sense to have in a browser because it supported unauthenticated downloads.
SFTP, as a protocol which runs over SSH, basically requires authentication. (You could conceivably set up an SSH server to allow authentication against a "guest" user, but that gives security folks the heebie-jeebies.) So it doesn't really make sense to link to an SFTP resource in a web context, making it very low value to support in a browser.
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#46I'm curious as to how many people use FTP in the browser?
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
The entirety of changes to one of the files in the past 13 years is here: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/log/tip/netwerk/strea... There's more changes on nsFtpConnectionThread.cpp: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/log/tip/netwerk/proto... Looking at those changes, it's clear that there has been very little substantive modifications to the FTP code itself, as opposed to keeping up with style guide change…
Perhaps they should take the opportunity to rewrite it in Rust.
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#48One more reason not to use firefox. Firefox became the younger brother of Chrome. Why they can't be independent and think for themselves ?
No Gecko and no Chrome? I'm waiting for you to say we should all start using Brave. Please say it.
To be honest i like Seamonkey :) Maybe i am too old.
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
For sure it is unencrypted, so it is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks.
I'm sure the majority of people that still use FTP aren't relying on a browser for access but people still use it. Why not just deprecate standard FTP and only support FTPS and SFTP?
Re: Mozilla will remove FTP support in Firefox
#50I'm curious as to how many people use FTP in the browser?
I would genuinely be surprised if even 5% of users used FTP in the last year. But damn do I wish they kept the feature in; Firefox should distinguish itself as the tech worker's browser, sorta like a forensics live CD that has every imaginable tool you need for deep work.
source: biased developer :-)