Should China pay some sort of reparations? Maybe in the form of contributing to a WHO preparedness fund/initiative with stocking supplies that could be deployed faster next time? China needs to pay for their 1) lack of sanitary standards surrounding their markets and 2) their coverup which exacerbated the situation.
Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
21–30 of 77 posts
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#22China's official stance is that virus was developed by CIA and brought to Wuhan by US military [1]. So they'll have to reopen wet markets or else be seen as admitting that the virus actually originated in one of them in China rather than in a CIA lab. [1] https://twitter.com/zlj517/status/1238111898828066823
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#23China's official stance is that virus was developed by CIA and brought to Wuhan by US military [1]. So they'll have to reopen wet markets or else be seen as admitting that the virus actually originated in one of them in China rather than in a CIA lab. [1] https://twitter.com/zlj517/status/1238111898828066823
If we take a few verbal statements of political figure or government officials as official stance. Then US' official stance must be fascism xenophobic totalitarian antiintellectal ...
Let not fall with the questionable thinking cultivated by propaganda and fear mongering
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#24China's official stance is that virus was developed by CIA and brought to Wuhan by US military [1]. So they'll have to reopen wet markets or else be seen as admitting that the virus actually originated in one of them in China rather than in a CIA lab. [1] https://twitter.com/zlj517/status/1238111898828066823
Please don't spread conspiracy theories without linking to a reliable source.
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#25[deleted]
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#26China's official stance is that virus was developed by CIA and brought to Wuhan by US military [1]. So they'll have to reopen wet markets or else be seen as admitting that the virus actually originated in one of them in China rather than in a CIA lab. [1] https://twitter.com/zlj517/status/1238111898828066823
Citation please? If we take a few verbal statements of political figure or government officials as official stance. Then US' official stance must be fascism xenophobic totalitarian antiintellectal ... Let not fall with the questionable thinking cultivated by propaganda and fear mongering
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/13/asia/china-coronavirus-us-lij...
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#27Should China pay some sort of reparations? Maybe in the form of contributing to a WHO preparedness fund/initiative with stocking supplies that could be deployed faster next time? China needs to pay for their 1) lack of sanitary standards surrounding their markets and 2) their coverup which exacerbated the situation.
China should have used their resources to seal everything and everyone the minute they knew. I agree with Trump on this one, they should have stopped it there. Bats, civets were all linked to previous infections and we know bats have other viruses waiting for us
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#28Yes
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#29Should China pay some sort of reparations? Maybe in the form of contributing to a WHO preparedness fund/initiative with stocking supplies that could be deployed faster next time? China needs to pay for their 1) lack of sanitary standards surrounding their markets and 2) their coverup which exacerbated the situation.
Re: Is China Ground Zero for a Future Pandemic? (2017)
#30China's official stance is that virus was developed by CIA and brought to Wuhan by US military [1]. So they'll have to reopen wet markets or else be seen as admitting that the virus actually originated in one of them in China rather than in a CIA lab. [1] https://twitter.com/zlj517/status/1238111898828066823