Mac mini
apple.com
Mac mini
1–10 of 259 posts
Re: Mac mini
#2Re: Mac mini
#3Business as usual for Apple...
In recent years they became an Intel but without an AMD in sight, they do it because they can.
Re: Mac mini
#4Re: Mac mini
#5Thanks, but I would skip this Mac Mini and go for the latest maxed out NUC instead.
Re: Mac mini
#6It’s such a shame that’s the best Intel can do in that thermal envelope.
AMD is about to ship Ryzen 4000 mobile chips with lower TDP, great integrated graphics, higher clock speeds and more cores. It would have worked fine in the Mac mini. Imagine how good the desktop APUs will be when those come out.
Re: Mac mini
#7Re: Mac mini
#8The Mac Minis are still expensive and underwhelming (even when maxed out) when compared with the top of the range NUCs with even AMD GPUs. The Skull and Ghost Canyon NUCs are great for Linux CIs or building large projects or I could even go far to either Hackintosh a few NUCs to surpass the need to buy a Mac Mini anyway for next 5 years. Thanks, but I would skip this Mac Mini and go for the latest maxed out NUC inste…
Having just moved to a Windows 10 shop running on cheapest-possible Dell hotdesking workstations, I’m starting to miss macOS and all its command-spacebar glory!
Re: Mac mini
#9Re: Mac mini
#10You need something more powerful than this Mac Mini just to be able to scroll that webpage.