This seems like a good outcome overall. NPM being such an important pillar in the software supply chain while having an unviable business model and largely being funded by VC money was never a good position to be in. There are problems with more of the software ecosystem consolidating with a single entity but it still feels like an improvement.
NPM Is Joining GitHub
41–50 of 588 posts
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#42Gotta respect how Microsoft couldn't build anything the open source community wanted to work with/on so instead they used their Windows and Office monopoly to buy everyone's favorite playgrounds.
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#43https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extingu... Whelp, time to look for backup solutions for when Microsoft continues their strategy. Even today there’s an article about github flagging (re shadow banning) a user with 10k+ lib users, and no response from them as to why the ban occurred. Thinking of adding an “in case of emergency” link in my README for users in case of sudden service loss.
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#44Sometimes I wonder what the business world (and the internet) would be like if mergers and acquisitions weren't allowed. Like, if businesses had to be sustainable or they'd just die, rather than capturing a whole market while eating VC money, maybe we'd all be better off? All of the really embarrassing stuff coming out of SV would just go away? Just Pinboards and Sourcehuts and Mastodons ruling the web?
I'm capitalistically illiterate, so somebody please tell me why this thought is stupid.
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#45Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#46Wait, so is it joining Microsoft? Or is it under Github, which is under Microsoft? I don't fully understand the way it's governed from this article.
Part of GitHub (I work at GitHub and lead the Packages team)
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#47I'm surprised there's not a single mention of "Microsoft" in this or the npm announcement [1], given the old-evil-history of Microsoft and the new-nice Microsoft we have today. I would expect that there was at least a mention, considering the reason that most modules in npm are still in ES5 is exactly because of the monopolistic practices that Microsoft followed back in the day which makes Internet Explorer still rel…
I mean. It's a subsidiary. I understand your sentiment but mentioning Microsoft would be like signaling that GitHub doesn't have any autonomy which is quite the contrary to what Microsoft said when buying it. So don't expect sudden sincerity on this. There's a reason why they haven't added Microsoft branding to areas like the footer.
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#48I'm surprised there's not a single mention of "Microsoft" in this or the npm announcement [1], given the old-evil-history of Microsoft and the new-nice Microsoft we have today. I would expect that there was at least a mention, considering the reason that most modules in npm are still in ES5 is exactly because of the monopolistic practices that Microsoft followed back in the day which makes Internet Explorer still rel…
Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#49Re: NPM Is Joining GitHub
#50This seems like a good outcome overall. NPM being such an important pillar in the software supply chain while having an unviable business model and largely being funded by VC money was never a good position to be in. There are problems with more of the software ecosystem consolidating with a single entity but it still feels like an improvement.
It was already consolidated. The vast majority of public npm packages are already hosted on Github. The dependency on them has been there since the beginning.