"Github acquires npm" would be a better title IMO.
Meanwhile, I almost have my team switched to yarn.
21–30 of 588 posts
"Github acquires npm" would be a better title IMO.
Meanwhile, I almost have my team switched to yarn.
I occasionally forget that Microsoft bought GitHub. They certainly don't do anything here to remind me of that fact. How separate from MS has GitHub been in day-to-day operations?
Embrace, extend, extinguish.
Regarding "trace a change from a GitHub pull request to the npm package version that fixed it" will there be an API to add a source in case the change was made outside of GitHub? Although I recognize that the vast majority of changes to npm packages happen on GitHub.
I would expect that there was at least a mention, considering the reason that most modules in npm are still in ES5 is exactly because of the monopolistic practices that Microsoft followed back in the day which makes Internet Explorer still relevant.
Not negative, not positive comment. Just surprising there was no mention. And I do think Microsoft is doing a great job recently with Open Source in general.
[1] https://blog.npmjs.org/post/612764866888007680/next-phase-mo...
I just finished reading this related HN post "How GitHub blocked me (and all my libraries)" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22593595
Is this a too big to fail kind of charity acquisition?
This seems like a good outcome overall. NPM being such an important pillar in the software supply chain while having an unviable business model and largely being funded by VC money was never a good position to be in. There are problems with more of the software ecosystem consolidating with a single entity but it still feels like an improvement.
But, you know, we've had decades of companies whose 'business model' is just their exit strategy...