Earlier quoted context omitted.
You got bored of collecting an easy paycheck? But do you think tech hiring will really slow down? I feel like there is just too much momentum in the area. We are the force multipliers.
Yeah I had just switched to pentesting, was eager to get started. Killed some passion. Believe me, I'd still be collecting it if I knew this was going to happen. >But do you think tech hiring will really slow down? We should be good but these are extraordinary times.
U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
61–70 of 96 posts
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#62If COVID-19 digs in deep in the US then there is going to be a transformational change in how US citizens think about work, travel, entertainment, security, and the relationship between US citizens and their government. All of these aspects are intertwined: Work: More people will work more time from home and many firms will switch to virtually full time remote with limited physical gathering. This will decrease the c…
Even the Spanish Flu didn't manage to do that and the actual death toll was even higher than the projections from COVID-19.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#63One of my podcasts recently said something that I found very fitting: Americans really love themselves some socialism when they get it.
The legendary Craig T. Nelson quote comes to mind: "I've been on food stamps and welfare. Anybody help me out? No."
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#64I wonder if people who don't have regular jobs would be able to use these services in any way? As far as I know, self employed people don't qualify for these for example. I'm not an expert, but that's what it looked like last time I checked.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#65You know what else would help? Since the risk curve bends sharply upward at age 60, immediately allow anyone to start drawing full social security payments at age 60, without any sort of penalty. Those companies that value their older workers would now be in the position of making work-from-home a full-fledged option, because the bargaining power would shift to where it belongs - the worker.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#66One of my podcasts recently said something that I found very fitting: Americans really love themselves some socialism when they get it.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
The $1.5 trillion injection doesn't actually cost any money. The Fed is making short-term fully-collateralized loans.
Yes, just like how poor people can get 1.5 trillion in subsidized payday loans to cover the gap between pay checks...oh wait. It’s absolutely a bailout.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#68If COVID-19 digs in deep in the US then there is going to be a transformational change in how US citizens think about work, travel, entertainment, security, and the relationship between US citizens and their government. All of these aspects are intertwined: Work: More people will work more time from home and many firms will switch to virtually full time remote with limited physical gathering. This will decrease the c…
> " If COVID-19 digs in deep in the US then there is going to be a transformational change in how US citizens think about work, travel, entertainment, security, and the relationship between US citizens and their government. " Even the Spanish Flu didn't manage to do that and the actual death toll was even higher than the projections from COVID-19.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#69One of my podcasts recently said something that I found very fitting: Americans really love themselves some socialism when they get it.
Re: U.S. Labor Department allows unemployment benefits for coronavirus
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, just like how poor people can get 1.5 trillion in subsidized payday loans to cover the gap between pay checks...oh wait. It’s absolutely a bailout.
Payday loans are generally not overnight and are typically not collateralized; they are in fact very risky. Repo's are overnight borrowing collateralized by the US Treasuries. Basically it is borrowing to maintain capitalization requirements in these high volatility times. From the perspective of the US government they have literally 0 risk (you are guaranteed to get back either USD denominated money or US treasury).
You should compare it to a payday loan that is collateralized [1]. And then where the collateral happens to be insufficient because a glut of that item just came on the market (analogous to the sudden rush of banks needing to convert their Treasurys to cash).
For the ordinary person, "Sorry, can't help you, you just have to deal with the fact that everyone else is selling that product too and so it doesn't provide the value you want and you have to take a big loss or an interest rate corresponding to higher risk."
For banks, "Omg! You can't sell your bonds at par because everyone else is trying to sell before maturity? You poor thing, let me buy them up for you with new money!"
[1] Sometimes referred to as "title loans", as you might e.g. put up your (remaining equity in your) car as the collateral.