Live data from Hacker News

Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

peterc.org

31–37 of 37 posts

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#31

Funny you should mention this...The Startup Foundry is doing exactly that. A blog focused only on startups. Check it out, we have gained a lot of traction and have a relatively large following for being so new (about two weeks). http://thestartupfoundry.com

That is a really great, easy-to-read layout. You have at least one new regular reader. :-)

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#32
post #7

Arrington says that writing about startups would not be the best business decision, and he is probably right - less people interested in startups than Apple, Facebook, etc as well as a reduced # of advertisers. How would a "startup-only blog" pay the bills? The Startup Foundry guys - would love to hear your thoughts.

Paul Hontz here (aka g0atbutt), founder of the startup foundry. The short answer is I don't know...yet. I believe TSF will turn into a profitable business (and based on the investment offers I've received, other people do to). I want TSF to ooze value from every article,video, and pic. After that's taken care of, I believe the perfect revenue model will present itself. Until then we will keep pushing forward.

Paul - Will be good to see what you guys come up with. One branding thought (and take this with a grain of salt as we run one site called ChubbyBrain) is why not lose startup in the name. It gives you room to grow in the future if you decide you do need to change/alter focus. At present, the name The Startup Foundry boxes you in. Just an unsolicited $.02.

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#33
post #11

Funny you should mention this...The Startup Foundry is doing exactly that. A blog focused only on startups. Check it out, we have gained a lot of traction and have a relatively large following for being so new (about two weeks). http://thestartupfoundry.com

So... and this is a serious question. Let's say you cover the next Twitter or Facebook before they become the next Twitter or Facebook. Once they explode in popularity, are you going to stop writing about them? Even though those articles are getting the most traffic on the site? And tons of speciality sites start appearing just about Twitter and Facebook. And you even know people from Twitter and Facebook since you p…

To be honest with you....your question is a good one. And since I am not the editor or the founder of the site I cannot say with 100% certainty that this is correct but my answer would be: yes. The main focus of the site is to cover startups. As far as I know there are no rules for only covering them when they are small. So if something I write about explodes like a Facebook or Twitter I will certainly being following up with them. In my mind that would be a "gold mine" of an article in terms of information both for myself and for our readers. Now would I beat it to death and write twelve articles about it in a five day period just to get the page views? No. That crap drives me crazy. I would like to think that I would only cover them if something significant was happening with them.

How does MacRumors decide when they are going to do another story on something that is hot?

I will check with my boss/editor and see what his thoughts are on the subject...

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#34
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So... and this is a serious question. Let's say you cover the next Twitter or Facebook before they become the next Twitter or Facebook. Once they explode in popularity, are you going to stop writing about them? Even though those articles are getting the most traffic on the site? And tons of speciality sites start appearing just about Twitter and Facebook. And you even know people from Twitter and Facebook since you p…

A very good question. Will they be really able to resist "Poxxer, who we broke the news on in 2011 here and here" ...pfft always hate that start to a blog post. If they really would drop startups that made it big they could make it a feature. Instead of a deadpool, they can add startups to a bigpool, and tease the major sites with it: "we followed them then, you follow them now"

Ha! I like that idea! Thanks for that!

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#35

Funny you should mention this...The Startup Foundry is doing exactly that. A blog focused only on startups. Check it out, we have gained a lot of traction and have a relatively large following for being so new (about two weeks). http://thestartupfoundry.com

That is a really great, easy-to-read layout. You have at least one new regular reader. :-)

Great! Welcome aboard!

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#36
post #6

Funny you should mention this...The Startup Foundry is doing exactly that. A blog focused only on startups. Check it out, we have gained a lot of traction and have a relatively large following for being so new (about two weeks). http://thestartupfoundry.com

Is twitter the only way to get in contact with you? I don't see any contact page (or really anything besides the articles themselves).

Yeah for now we are working the majority of our stuff through Twitter. Which goes to show just how good of a tool Twitter is. If you want to talk to me about covering something send me an email at: knowlife@me.com. Cheers!

Re: Michael Arrington’s Dreams of a Blog for True Startups

#37
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So... and this is a serious question. Let's say you cover the next Twitter or Facebook before they become the next Twitter or Facebook. Once they explode in popularity, are you going to stop writing about them? Even though those articles are getting the most traffic on the site? And tons of speciality sites start appearing just about Twitter and Facebook. And you even know people from Twitter and Facebook since you p…

To be honest with you....your question is a good one. And since I am not the editor or the founder of the site I cannot say with 100% certainty that this is correct but my answer would be: yes. The main focus of the site is to cover startups. As far as I know there are no rules for only covering them when they are small. So if something I write about explodes like a Facebook or Twitter I will certainly being followin…

Well, it's easy with MacRumors since Apple is hot. And that's what we write about. :)
Post reply on HN