Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was surprised to learn about the glassware. When I learned that mdma therapy for ptsd wouldn’t be available for years and would cost 15k even with insurance, I dusted off my old organic chemistry book. I can’t believe I’ve been made to do this in order to get medical treatment.
99% of people would just find a street dealer or buy off the dark web. You're the 1% that the laws are actually established for. > I can’t believe I’ve been made to do this in order to get medical treatment. No one made you break bad and then brag about it on the internet... Fabricating your own controlled substances is exactly why certain types of glassware are illegal.
Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules
111–114 of 114 posts
Re: Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules
#112I mean, you really ought to be able to experiment with explosives in a free country, as long as you're not hurting anyone / planning to hurt anyone. It's obviously legal when companies in the industry do it. Why shouldn't it be for private citizens.
”as long as you're not hurting anyone / planning to hurt anyone” By that definition, car racing on public streets, running red lights and ignoring speed limits is absolutely fine, as long as you’re not hurting anyone / planning to hurt anyone. Regulations that limit the risks people get exposed to exist for a reason: you can’t undo damage done to others by punishing the culprit. That’s why, for example, reckless driv…
Re: Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules
#113Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you know the names of the people in your own country who have nuclear weapons? Do you have access to the information about what they intend to do with them? Is it, perhaps, illegal for them to even tell you?
In the US the person who has nuclear weapons is Dan Brouillette.
Even if he were the Secretary of Defense, he would have no weapons. They merely command people who command other people who have such weapons.
You don’t know the names, plans, or motivations of any of those people.
Re: Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the US the person who has nuclear weapons is Dan Brouillette.
He’s the Secretary of the DoE. He has no weapons. Even if he were the Secretary of Defense, he would have no weapons. They merely command people who command other people who have such weapons. You don’t know the names, plans, or motivations of any of those people.