Unicode 13.0
unicode.org
Unicode 13.0
1–10 of 96 posts
Re: Unicode 13.0
#2So how far off is Unicode from being 'done'? At what point will they be able to stop adding characters and scripts?
Re: Unicode 13.0
#3Re: Unicode 13.0
#4> Unicode 13.0 adds 5,930 characters, for a total of 143,859 characters. These additions include 4 new scripts, for a total of 154 scripts, as well as 55 new emoji characters. So how far off is Unicode from being 'done'? At what point will they be able to stop adding characters and scripts?
Re: Unicode 13.0
#5The next one needs a coronavirus emoji. Maybe a flu one too while we're at it.
Re: Unicode 13.0
#6Re: Unicode 13.0
#7> Unicode 13.0 adds 5,930 characters, for a total of 143,859 characters. These additions include 4 new scripts, for a total of 154 scripts, as well as 55 new emoji characters. So how far off is Unicode from being 'done'? At what point will they be able to stop adding characters and scripts?
Once people stop needing and/or inventing new characters and scripts.
Re: Unicode 13.0
#8> Unicode 13.0 adds 5,930 characters, for a total of 143,859 characters. These additions include 4 new scripts, for a total of 154 scripts, as well as 55 new emoji characters. So how far off is Unicode from being 'done'? At what point will they be able to stop adding characters and scripts?
Once people stop needing and/or inventing new characters and scripts.
This part is dear to me, as I helped craft it. It includes 2x3 videotext mosaic characters that will make it much easier to draw large text have have better quality charts in text terminal interfaces.
And, of course, the ability to properly encode documents that were generated in computers in the 70's and 80's that contained those platform-specific characters.
For 14 we are planning on adding symbols from the Sharp MZ series and the large text characters (3x3 cells) of HP terminals.
Re: Unicode 13.0
#9Re: Unicode 13.0
#10The next one needs a coronavirus emoji. Maybe a flu one too while we're at it.
Edit: Apparently HN doesn't support unicode?
I was trying to say:
U+1F637 or U+1F912 not good enough?