Live data from Hacker News

Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

pcworld.com

41–50 of 188 posts

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#41
post #19
post #8

12V makes so much more sense to be sending around - the losses at lower voltages are rough. It would be nice to replace legacy molex connectors with a more modern standard, however.

> It would be nice to replace legacy molex connectors with a more modern standard Any example of the modern one? I personally have no issues with the current one. I am not sure if those molex connectors should be called as legacy.

The SATA power connector is the obvious successor. Most random doodads (e.g. internal fan controllers) have moved from using molex connectors in the past to SATA power connectors now.

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#42

Four important things to consider: First, this already happened to some extent. Outside of drives and fans, the virtually all of the power used in your system is exclusively 12v; either from the 12v pins on your ATX24 or P4 or EPS12 connectors, or via the PCI-E connectors; very little non-drive or non-fan power is supplied via 3.3 or 5v rails. Second, almost all PSUs today use 12v DC to 3.3/5v DC converters to increa…

Not sure I would classify AMD as the dominant player in the field just yet.

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#43
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most desktop users would probably prefer a UPS that also ensured their monitor stayed on.

I actually leave my monitor off UPS intentionally. While I'm away, I'd rather my workstation survive a brownout or short loss of power and if I'm actively working, it's easy enough to move the monitor's power cable to the UPS to save my work and shut down. My CPU draws ~45W at idle; my monitor draws a whopping 130W — having it on battery materially shortens the off-AC runtime.

Your monitor shouldn't draw 130W at idle. My 34" monitor is ~3W in sleep mode, 34W when on. Even my eight year old 55" TV only draws 90W when on.

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#45
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A typical CPU (or SSD even) uses a voltage of 0.9V currently, surely it doesn't matter whether the motherboard is converting 12V to 0.9V or 5V to 0.9V. Back when this stuff was originally designed 12V, 5V and 3.3V was all you needed (actually with the AT standard it was just 12V for motors and 5V for logic, that was pre-CMOS). Now every component requires a different voltage (if there's any standard it might be 1.8V…

Maybe for a lot of things, but I've seen plenty of SSDs that only need 5v power, and I've never seen one that only needed 12v.

You mean 3.3V (since M.2 is 3.3V only)?

It's trivial to convert 12V to 3.3V tbh

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#46
post #34
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why does this still have 10 pins? 2 pins would be plenty. No, modern desktop can easily use up to 30A constant load. No way to provide so much over 1mm wires at 12V

10-gauge is rated for 30A, though that's 3.6mm.

And it looks like 2mm and rated for 15A, and 1mm for 10A.

(I thought DC current used the volume of the wire and AC the surface area, so I'm a bit surprised that wire ratings don't distinguish AC and DC. Though I suppose heat dissipation is determined by the surface area so perhaps that makes sense.)

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you’re sending 1500 watts directly into a motherboard, something is probably wrong. Massive power draws (CPU, GPU) would always get their own direct connection, just as they do today. Apply this simple rule of thumb: watts become heat. The only major exception to this is where the power has exited the computer via USB or similar.

I haven't assembled a PC since the pentium 200 days. I recall hard drives, floppy drives, and the motherboard had their own power connections but not the CPU or GPU of the time. Still a single pin is probably something like a #18 gauge and would only be good for 10A before it gets too warm for comfort.

I always thought that was why the big ATX connector has multiple 12V wires, multiple GND wires, etc. To push heaps of current, but using a normal gauge of wire, rather than something huge.

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#48
Makes sense. Should have happened long ago. All those old voltages date from when +5 from the power supply was used directly by the logic. Facebook's Open Compute rack delivers only +12 to the boards and drives, and that's from 2011. There's a power supply in the base of the rack that takes in three-phase AC or 48 VDC or whatever and puts out +12VDC. All other conversion is on the board. This is just catching up desktops to where the data center went years ago.

Re: Intel is changing the future of power supplies with its ATX12VO spec

#50
> PSU vendors don’t want to release ATX12VO products for DIY builders until there are motherboards that support ATX12VO. Motherboard vendors don’t want to create products until power supply makers support them.

Seems like that could be addressed with one of two adapters:

- A passive adapter cable with a female ATX connector (with the 3.3V and 5V pins disconnected) and male ATX12VO connector

- An active adapter cable/board with a female ATX12VO connector, the necessary circuits to step voltages down to 3.3V and 5V, and a male ATX connector.

One or both of these could happen today and immediately solve that chicken-and-egg problem for the custom market, no?

Post reply on HN