“The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
61–70 of 76 posts
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#62Watch the whole thing. You will thank me later.
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#63And for those of you who would like to hear the original Radio Series again, it's being repeated on BBC Radio 4 Extra right now: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000g55m I wonder if they will have the original Pink Floyd music when they land on Magrathea, or whether it will be edited out, as it was in the BBC recordings due to rights issues.
The game is also on the bbc, for anyone feeling nostalgic for the BBC Micro game. I spent many frustrated hours dying in that game as a child. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/1g84m0sXpnNCv84GpN...
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#64Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#65Well, that is going to explain so much about 2020. It’s like the planets aligning. I fully expect Vulcans to make contact with humanity this year. Or Klingons.
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#66It's quite fitting that we have Zaphod Beeblebrox clones in both Nr 10 and the White House.
I do hope the true ruler of things turns out to be an old bloke in a hut with no interest in anything beyond a vague affection for his (possibly imaginary) cat. Otherwise we’re really in trouble.
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have questions about populism. Hearing about Roman populism makes me think it's better than Nobel rule. At least occasionally the masses get a policy that benefits them. For instance the Trump tax cuts and Obamacare took money from the 10% and gave it to the masses. (I'm a bitter 10%er that thinks it's time for the 10% to unite) So what's wrong with populism? The class warfare? Is the actual issue demagogry like Tr…
Populist politicians claim that they represent "The People." The problem, as Umberto Eco pointed out, is that The People is a fiction. We have only The Public, which is a collection of individuals with diverse interests and beliefs. We aggregate The Public's will though democracy as it is impossible for a single individual or political group to speak for everyone. But populists claim that democratic institutions do n…
The kind of populism that promises easy answers by oversimplifying the issues is a problem.
At the same time, I often feel that there is a deep flaw in modern "moderate/centrist" thinking in not trying hard enough to do the things that would actually be popular, instead coming up with overly technocratic and ultimately flawed arguments for maintaining a status quo that provides bad results for a large fraction of the population.
As a politician, how would you call for getting out of that without being branded as the bad kind of populist?
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have questions about populism. Hearing about Roman populism makes me think it's better than Nobel rule. At least occasionally the masses get a policy that benefits them. For instance the Trump tax cuts and Obamacare took money from the 10% and gave it to the masses. (I'm a bitter 10%er that thinks it's time for the 10% to unite) So what's wrong with populism? The class warfare? Is the actual issue demagogry like Tr…
Populist politicians claim that they represent "The People." The problem, as Umberto Eco pointed out, is that The People is a fiction. We have only The Public, which is a collection of individuals with diverse interests and beliefs. We aggregate The Public's will though democracy as it is impossible for a single individual or political group to speak for everyone. But populists claim that democratic institutions do n…
Actually, thank you for that description. It's the best summary I've ever read and cleared up a lot of my confusion about the term.
Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42
#69> Douglas Adams’s masterwork is blithely comic in tone but deeply serious in purpose. I thought it was just a funny book. What is its "deeply serious purpose"?