Live data from Hacker News

“The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

economist.com

31–40 of 76 posts

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#31

It's quite fitting that we have Zaphod Beeblebrox clones in both Nr 10 and the White House.

I agree. Do we know the actual rulers? I'm thinking a few Russians who gave Trump loans and owners of American steel companies, but I'm not sure who the specific billionaires are.

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#32
post #23
post #11

> Douglas Adams’s masterwork is blithely comic in tone but deeply serious in purpose. I thought it was just a funny book. What is its "deeply serious purpose"?

The contemporary resurgence of populism in politics feels a lot like the description of democracy in the "Wrong lizard won"-passage. You can read it here: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/162557-it-comes-from-a-very...

I have questions about populism.

Hearing about Roman populism makes me think it's better than Nobel rule. At least occasionally the masses get a policy that benefits them. For instance the Trump tax cuts and Obamacare took money from the 10% and gave it to the masses. (I'm a bitter 10%er that thinks it's time for the 10% to unite)

So what's wrong with populism? The class warfare?

Is the actual issue demagogry like Trump and Bernie that have fake policy that wins the emotional and uneducated Masses?

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#33
post #11

> Douglas Adams’s masterwork is blithely comic in tone but deeply serious in purpose. I thought it was just a funny book. What is its "deeply serious purpose"?

Perhaps to call the Christian worldview into question using sarcasm and sardonic humor.

What particular bits?

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#34
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think I still have casette tapes of the original run.

Heh, when it was first broadcast here, I taped it off the radio, but I think my tapes are long gone.

I still have the C90s somewhere

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#35

And for those of you who would like to hear the original Radio Series again, it's being repeated on BBC Radio 4 Extra right now: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000g55m I wonder if they will have the original Pink Floyd music when they land on Magrathea, or whether it will be edited out, as it was in the BBC recordings due to rights issues.

The game is also on the bbc, for anyone feeling nostalgic for the BBC Micro game. I spent many frustrated hours dying in that game as a child.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/1g84m0sXpnNCv84GpN...

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#36

“There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”

While I’ve never heard this before, I did have a rather unfortunate chemically-induced experience that viscerally explored this idea in more detail.. :-)

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#37

It's quite fitting that we have Zaphod Beeblebrox clones in both Nr 10 and the White House.

I do hope the true ruler of things turns out to be an old bloke in a hut with no interest in anything beyond a vague affection for his (possibly imaginary) cat.

Otherwise we’re really in trouble.

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#38

And for those of you who would like to hear the original Radio Series again, it's being repeated on BBC Radio 4 Extra right now: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000g55m I wonder if they will have the original Pink Floyd music when they land on Magrathea, or whether it will be edited out, as it was in the BBC recordings due to rights issues.

Just listened to Fit the Third: Marvin hums up some Floyd. Maybe just this once sanity ruled.

Re: “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” turns 42

#40
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The contemporary resurgence of populism in politics feels a lot like the description of democracy in the "Wrong lizard won"-passage. You can read it here: https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/162557-it-comes-from-a-very...

I have questions about populism. Hearing about Roman populism makes me think it's better than Nobel rule. At least occasionally the masses get a policy that benefits them. For instance the Trump tax cuts and Obamacare took money from the 10% and gave it to the masses. (I'm a bitter 10%er that thinks it's time for the 10% to unite) So what's wrong with populism? The class warfare? Is the actual issue demagogry like Tr…

Populist politicians claim that they represent "The People." The problem, as Umberto Eco pointed out, is that The People is a fiction. We have only The Public, which is a collection of individuals with diverse interests and beliefs. We aggregate The Public's will though democracy as it is impossible for a single individual or political group to speak for everyone. But populists claim that democratic institutions do not represent The People, because they are corrupt and controlled by The Elite. Only the populists truly speak for The People and anyone opposed to them is therefore automatically also an enemy of The People. Enemies are very useful to the populist. (Sanders has spent his career railing against the 1% on behalf of the 99% and Trump, of course, has literally called the press "the enemy of the people.") In short, it's a corrosive ideology that works by undermining faith in democracy and dividing the public into friend and foe.
Post reply on HN