Live data from Hacker News

Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

emissionsanalytics.com

241–250 of 336 posts

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been wearing studded slip on crampons when walking my dog this winter. The ice has been ridiculous, I’ve fallen twice already when not wearing them. Not great for the sidewalks, I know, but the dog needs his walks or he would... get sad

I cannot believe a studded shoe would have any impact whatsoever on a concrete pavement. Human weight is nothing compared to that of a car.

By your logic, water running across concrete wouldn't create any wear on the concrete, but in truth, it does.

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#242
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

At that rate you would burn through the whole set of tires in less than 50,000km, so how is it possible? Could it be those nubs on new tires are accounting for a majority of the waste up front?

Do most people’s tyres last longer than 50k kms? Maybe I’m doing something wrong...

Somewhere around that, yes. Unleas you kill one by accident before that. Screws and tires don't mix too well...

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They're torn up from the road and rubbed off from the tyres themselves. The majority is obviously coming from the road. There's been studies done here in Sweden since we've banned studded winter tyres in some areas of Stockholm in an effort to reduce road wear and improve air quality. I don't know of any sources in English off the top of my head though. The last time I read an article about it though (2+ years ago, d…

That doesn't make sense to me either. Take a busy German highway (as I don't know the average load on US ones), easily 100k cars per day. There are parts of highways which don't get replaced for 20 years easily. Plus apart from tiny fraction of north europe (and maybe Canada?), nobody ever uses studs. Back of the envelope math tells me 1 km of highway would lose some 730 tonnes of asphalt, per year (so 14,600 tonnes…

A rough way to think about road wear is the weight over one axle to the fourth power times the number of axles.

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Brake pads have not used asbestos in several decades.

New pads on new passenger vehicles haven't, but it's still legal to use asbestos in aftermarket pads. https://parts.olathetoyota.com/what-are-brake-pads-made-of

Fitting or sale of automotive products containing asbestos has been banned in the EU since 2004

https://www.asbestosadvicehelpline.co.uk/is-asbestos-still-u...

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They must have meant grams because that is the basis of their 1000X statistic. The other number is also single digit but is in milligrams. That doesn't mean they're right, but it's the only way I can interpret what they're saying.

But 4.5g/km implies 225kg after 50000 km which doesn’t seem possible. Something definitely smells fishy.

That seems to be some heavy tyres, that's for sure.

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been wearing studded slip on crampons when walking my dog this winter. The ice has been ridiculous, I’ve fallen twice already when not wearing them. Not great for the sidewalks, I know, but the dog needs his walks or he would... get sad

I cannot believe a studded shoe would have any impact whatsoever on a concrete pavement. Human weight is nothing compared to that of a car.

The ground pressure of a human wearing studded shoes is an order of magnitude or more higher than the ground pressure of a car.

The ground pressure of a car is exactly equal to the PSI that you inflate the tire.

Take the weight of a human and divide by the surface area of of a started shoe you will find a significantly higher number.

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been wearing studded slip on crampons when walking my dog this winter. The ice has been ridiculous, I’ve fallen twice already when not wearing them. Not great for the sidewalks, I know, but the dog needs his walks or he would... get sad

I cannot believe a studded shoe would have any impact whatsoever on a concrete pavement. Human weight is nothing compared to that of a car.

Weight of a masonry hammer is nothing compared to the weight of a human, yet it can destroy concrete with ease.

I'd guess it depends on how and how much you walk on what kind of pavement with what kind of studded shoes. Damage can realistically be imperceptible or ugly.

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have been wearing studded slip on crampons when walking my dog this winter. The ice has been ridiculous, I’ve fallen twice already when not wearing them. Not great for the sidewalks, I know, but the dog needs his walks or he would... get sad

I cannot believe a studded shoe would have any impact whatsoever on a concrete pavement. Human weight is nothing compared to that of a car.

[deleted]

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#249
post #70

Maybe offtopic but a surprising bit of extra information regarding wear and vehicles: Road wear scales with the fourth power of axle load, so heavier vehicles do much more damage than one might expect. Take a 40t truck with 5 axles vs. a small car with a weight of 1t and two axles (e.g. VW Polo, maybe an older VW Golf might only weigh 1t as well): (8t axle load / 0.5t axle load) = 16^4, i.e. the truck puts 2^16 (6553…

> Road wear scales with the fourth power of axle load, so heavier vehicles do much more damage than one might expect. Yes. Electric vehicles with their heavy batteries also make things worse.

The battery is heavy but the powertrain is much lighter. You can make light electric vehicles, look at the i3 for example.

Re: Pollution from tire wear is worse than exhaust emissions?

#250
post #213

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Non-exhaust emissions (NEE) are particles released into the air from brake wear, tyre wear, road surface wear and resuspension of road dust during on-road vehicle usage."

Roads are filthy. Cody's Lab once did a video where he collected road dust from the side of a highway, and refined out all the precious metals from it. That's from one small section of highway, just imagine the scale of the pollution across the whole of the states. Concrete dust, rubber, metals, fuel, oil. Cars and car infrastructure is dirty business. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5GPWJPLcHg

If one are outside near any mountainous road here in Northern California, motor vehicles pass by with the odor of brake pad + brake disc (mostly brake pad?) near the bottom with a very strong, distinctive bitter sweet metallic odor and that's probably a tiny proportion of the material.
Post reply on HN