I'll believe this when the third result for "filled torus" isn't "Cum Filled Pussy Porn Videos" unless safe search is enabled. DDG's contextual awareness is abysmal.
DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
191–200 of 490 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
It looks more and more like Google wants to convert native search hits to paid clicks... Notice how often when you search for "company" you find the company's ad first and then below the native search result...
Agreed, and the ad is often immediately above the native search result 1-2. I'm guessing clicking the ad costs the company money per click, and the native search result doesn't? If I'm explicitly searching for a company, and I'd prefer that they don't have to incur an advertising penalty on my behalf, I'd need to scroll past the first result to the second.
Therefore, ads for a company that appear when the company name is clicked are considered highly relevant and useful, and therefore have a very high quality score and therefore very low price.
Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#193Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#194Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#195Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of DDG fans on HN blame the user or social conditioning and use that as a crutch. It’s BS. You need to provide clear examples of the differences in order to really make this argument to someone who might switch. What specifically are the differences? The last time this topic came up someone told me I was a total noob because I didn’t know how to use search and that was basically the extent of it.
An example of a difference: I live in Bristol. If I search for things like "car mechanic bristol", DDG comes up with lots of results from Bristol, Tennessee. It's not that DDG is worse than Google, it's just that DDG isn't tailoring the results to what it knows about me. The solution is to be more specific: "car mechanic bristol uk", for example, does the job.
Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#197Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yup there is (alpha.whize.co) the question mark at the top links to a blog post with our broader goals though we've refined them a bit since that post. I'll warn you though, the alpha has a really limited index (github results) but was meant to showcase how we think we'll initially prioritize results and gauge people's interest versus this is the final version because as you can imagine crawling the larger internet i…
No offense, but I literally cannot find anything on GitHub with this search engine.
Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#199I think I've figured out what is happening when people tell me that DuckDuckGo's results "aren't good enough". What's really happening is that they've been trained to search a certain way to using Google and because DDG doesn't have all the historical data of your searches on their platform they can't fill in the gaps as well. After a couple days using DDG I found the right vocabulary to get good local results and wh…
FWIW I use uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger.
Re: DuckDuckGo is good enough for regular use
#200Although, I should say, bing was equally good when I used it before duckduckgo, until they added that horrendous news feed in the bottom.