31–40 of 55 posts
How long until we see the headline “Summons allows court to monitor brains replaying memories in real time”
In the U.S constitutional complaint about right against self-incrimination. But if it worked well it would be too useful to let that right stand, so I'm sure the courts would decide it was not covered by the right.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In the U.S constitutional complaint about right against self-incrimination. But if it worked well it would be too useful to let that right stand, so I'm sure the courts would decide it was not covered by the right.
I'm sure they'd apply the same thing to it as they did with polygraphs.
This begs the question of why they used animals for 20 years.
What a timely article, as I JUST watched Brainstorm for the first time tonight. The story is exactly this.
One of the most fascinating things this article claims is that apparently these scientists were able to detect the firing of individual neurons. I have briefly looked up some of the technologies involved in brain scanning before and if this is true it would be greatly exceeding typical resolutions.
I’ve always wondered if there is a way to stimulate a brain so that you could replay a memory so vividly that it practically feels like you are there reliving it again, like the way you might experience a dream but with more clarity, almost like a form of time travel. I remember reading about some experiment in a psychology class where an old woman’s brain was probed and she was able to hear her highschool graduation…