Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
41–50 of 76 posts
Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#42On a related note, why can't we have public bug tracking on a private repo on github? This was the primary reason I went with Lighthouse.
Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#43redmine users may be interested in the recent fork: http://www.chiliproject.org the forking devs are going to be comitting some more radical changes it seems
Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#44Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#45NOTE: I ""SUPER-HATE"" it. But I am helpless. :(
Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#46Emacs http://orgmode.org/ in combination with http://mercurial.selenic.com/
Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#47Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#48a plain text TODO file within the repository of each project, together with a plain text TODO file in my dropbox that gets synced everywhere. Works very well.
Do you have a formal-ish system for this? Notice issue -> TODO -> write unit test -> fix issue -> cut + paste to ChangeLog?
Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#49Re: Poll: What do you use to track your bugs?
#50a plain text TODO file within the repository of each project, together with a plain text TODO file in my dropbox that gets synced everywhere. Works very well.
I really like this kind of solution for smaller projects, where a proper bug tracker is excessive overhead. Keep everything in the repo and it's much simpler to maintain. Do you have a formal-ish system for this? Notice issue -> TODO -> write unit test -> fix issue -> cut + paste to ChangeLog?
It's mostly: email to say bugs need fixing -> bugs get fixed -> fix gets committed and the bug removed from the todo -> email back that it's fixed.
It mostly concerns visual (html/css/templating) bugs or small js bugs that don't have unit tests/