Live data from Hacker News

The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

131–140 of 298 posts

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It may also be expected that the symptoms of the patients infected via facal-oral or conjunctival route will be lighter than those infected intranasally. That seems like the hypothesis they suggest. Interesting implications.

All the people who were made fun of in middle school for being a 'mouth breather' will have the last laugh.

can't laugh when you are breathing with your mouth, my friend :)

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#132
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not clear that it spreads via aerosols, in fact it's more likely that it spreads via droplet and contact. Thus the virtue of the mask is that it keeps the individual's fingers away from their faces. From the perspective of the theory in the article, masks keep people's fingers out of their noses. Of course, there are other ways to do that.

Such as?

Not picking your nose.

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#133
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Telling people they should wear masks because they don't put them on properly is like telling people they shouldn't drive cars because some people drive them into trees.

I am bookmarking this comment for the time after self-driving cars have become universally available.

Just remember to hold off on the gloating until after the self-driving cars stop occasionally driving into trees.

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#134
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oddly enough, I was on the "pandemic" bandwagon early enough that my period of anxiety and insomnia has now passed already. People get used to new states of affair pretty quickly.

I hardly ever have to deal with anxiety, but now I have a headcold and my coworker sitting 6-feet to my right has a mask on...

You should be the one wearing the mall though no?

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#135

As a side observation: most reporting seems rather binary, i.e. you either die or survive, period. What interests me the most, however, is how often survival means full recovery, especially now that the nervous system comes up. Are there any long term effects? Should one generally expect to come out of it worse, the same, or stronger? I'm much less afraid to die from this than to end up with chronic respiratory and/o…

There are patients that have been hospitalized in Wuhan for weeks or potentially months. Will they ever recover? Will that compound the already-critical lack of medical infrastructure?

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#136
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If that's your goal (and it is not an unreasonable one) you can achieve that with a bandanna. You don't need a surgical mask.

I'm enjoying the thought of software engineers everywhere coming into work with bandanas covering their faces.

don't worry the facial recognition technology has been perfected to track through face masks / bandanas

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/coronavirus-china-tech-fi...

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#137
post #71
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EDIT - Just to be clear, I'm not saying that people shouldn't take precautions or that it's not worth protecting vulnerable groups. I'm simply suggesting that perhaps there is news coverage about other things (remember the whole Hong Kong situation that we aren't hearing about suddenly?) that might still deserve some air time. The media is profiting off this story big time. It's like when the plane went missing and a…

I would like to see more details about those affected, age, immuno compromised or not, asthma or not. Its hard to really draw any comparison to flu or anything else as things stand right now.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-... is quite good, WHO.int have publications on it if you want a more trusted source (but this one seems good to me).

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#138
post #10

From the paper: > If the neuroinvasion of SARS-CoV-2 does take a part in the development of respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients, the precaution with masks will absolutely be the most effective measure to protect against the possible entry of the virus into the CNS. It may also be expected that the symptoms of the patients infected via facal-oral or conjunctival route will be lighter than those infected intranasa…

Yes, only a N95 or better mask would protect you from incoming, as opposed to outgoing, viruses, and these masks are both impractical for everyday wear and need to be conserved for public health users.

One of my coworkers, who is a staunch supporter for wearing face masks to protect against coronavirus, wears an N95 the entire time he's in the office. Yesterday he claimed he's having chest discomfort (which is what some people will feel when they wear N95 24x7 awake) and went to a hospital to demand a test for coronavirus infection. Needless to say his request got declined and he's doing just fine but I am simply speechless at the irony.

Re: The neuroinvasive potential of SARS-CoV2

#139
post #118
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EDIT - Just to be clear, I'm not saying that people shouldn't take precautions or that it's not worth protecting vulnerable groups. I'm simply suggesting that perhaps there is news coverage about other things (remember the whole Hong Kong situation that we aren't hearing about suddenly?) that might still deserve some air time. The media is profiting off this story big time. It's like when the plane went missing and a…

Given there's no herd immunity, and the virulance of the strain, estimates are 40-70% of the population will contract the virus within a year 0.2% of 40% of the US Population is 260,000 deaths within a year[1] "it's just the flu" greatly underappreciates just how deadly influenza actually is If the mortality rate is more in the 2%+ range, we're looking at millions of deaths in the US alone. [1] https://www.wolframalp…

I've seen very different estimates. I'm gonna go off on a limb and say that there's probably more misinformation out there than real information. People should remain calm, take [0]reasonable precautions, and make decisions based on the latest information from credible sources such as the [1]CDC - rather than the media.

[0]https://twitter.com/eugenegu/status/1235247642814214145

[1]https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/related-stig...

Post reply on HN