Live data from Hacker News

Waymo Via

waymo.com

1–10 of 277 posts

Re: Waymo Via

#3
There's a rideshare company called Via. Is this intentionally designed to take away their SEO?? I'd be surprised if there isn't a trademark challenge for this, they're a competitor with Waymo.

Re: Waymo Via

#4
>and we’ll soon expand to Texas and New Mexico in the near future

pedantic but, as opposed to soon expanding in the far future? A little redundant.

Re: Waymo Via

#5

There's a rideshare company called Via. Is this intentionally designed to take away their SEO?? I'd be surprised if there isn't a trademark challenge for this, they're a competitor with Waymo.

There's a lot of things called Via, including a rail company

Re: Waymo Via

#6
post #4

>and we’ll soon expand to Texas and New Mexico in the near future pedantic but, as opposed to soon expanding in the far future? A little redundant.

Yeah that's what it's opposed to, before we knew nothing about their plans to expand and now we know it's happening soon instead of "soon" (hopefully)

Re: Waymo Via

#7
post #4

>and we’ll soon expand to Texas and New Mexico in the near future pedantic but, as opposed to soon expanding in the far future? A little redundant.

Far expanding in the soon future

Re: Waymo Via

#8
post #4

>and we’ll soon expand to Texas and New Mexico in the near future pedantic but, as opposed to soon expanding in the far future? A little redundant.

I think they mean Texas soon, and New Mexico in the near future. Maybe better to have written:

and we'll soon expand to Texas, and New Mexico in the near future

Re: Waymo Via

#9
Are these semis truly driverless or does the testing that Waymo is conducting still require staff to monitor the drive? I want to parse through the hype here.

Fully automated, point-to-point, driverless semis seem far off, as Hotz of Comma.ai was pointing out. Am I wrong on this assumption?

Re: Waymo Via

#10
post #4

>and we’ll soon expand to Texas and New Mexico in the near future pedantic but, as opposed to soon expanding in the far future? A little redundant.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN