Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
1–10 of 220 posts
Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#2Pull them off, and assign them to a cushy knowledge transfer process. You'll more safely learn about your true dependencies & get some of the knowledge you want at the same time.
Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#3Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#4Encode your knowledge into software, into data structures, into tests and active documentation.
Human organisations have faced these problems for thousands of years. And never solved them well. Maybe we need the new kid on the block to help
Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#5Edit: Yes, they'll hate it, but this should include a tour of duty Sales. Poor relationships & acrimony between sales & dev are based on a failure of understanding each other's jobs. And sales are the closest to the needs of customers, short of sitting with customers themselves.
Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#6Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#7Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#8Conceptually this is similar to having a wiki, except for that unless your company has people whose full time job it is to maintain the wiki then it will always be out of date and inaccurate; just deploying some wiki software tends to be pretty useless, and even in the rare cases where they are maintained the medium inherently doesn't preserve the tacit knowledge contained within the decision-making process itself.
Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#9Two weeks of paid vacation where the company isn't allowed to email them or call them for help: I guarantee that documentation practices will increase substantially.
Re: Ask HN: Good ways to capture institutional knowledge?
#10The answer is by requiring close team effort. Pair programming for example.
I’d one person leaves the organization, there should be “adjacent” employees who understand what they contributed.