Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are LOTS of competitors, but of course, not all are apples to apples. Here is a partial list of some of the more active wysiwyg editors: Quill: https://quilljs.com Slate: https://www.slatejs.org Trumbowyg: https://alex-d.github.io/Trumbowyg ContentTools: http://getcontenttools.com SummerNote: https://summernote.org Squire: https://github.com/neilj/Squire Editor.js: https://codex.so/editor ProseMirror: https://p…
Best I could find would be: https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/czi-prosemirror but they kinda stopped working on it.
Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
41–50 of 57 posts
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#42I was thinking of building something similar. Any other alternatives to similar solutions?
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
What you’d prefer they do? Moving rows around?
Probably nothing: they already exist in Chrome as, respectively, next/previous / top/bottom of the page. Edtr.io appears to hijack them for no reason.
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
Core contributor of Edtr.io here: Slate works well for editing text. Anything with a more complicated layout / UX gets really messy though, since with Slate, you always have to deal with the DOM / Slate's wrapper around contenteditable. And at least before Slate 0.50+, we (& the developers of Schul-Cloud independently of us) ran always in bugs, etc. This is why Edtr.io (similarly to ReactPages, fka ORY Editor) builds…
Here's the problem relying on slate (I've used it and all the others [quill, ckeditor, etc etc]) -- you are also relying on Ian Storm Taylor and he's known for going on a streak and re-writing things in a breaking manner. IMO you should just build the entire thing yourself.
Well that could be said for literally any 3rd party library. New updates may break things, that's why you need to pin the exact version you use to prevent things breaking.
I would rather use a library which has been tested and used by many people, than reinvent the wheel on a bunch of things...
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#45The "add element" "+" button only sometimes seems to work, and when trying to add a paragraph of text, anything I type is immediately removed.
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#46Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#47I was thinking of building something similar. Any other alternatives to similar solutions?
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#48I was thinking of building something similar. Any other alternatives to similar solutions?
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#49This is really nice. One note: the landing page doesn’t mention the MIT license or commercial use. I had to go to the repo to figure it out. Would love to look into integrating this editor in our email client. Is there an easy way for us to chat?
Re: Show HN: Edtr.io – Intuitive web editor, open source and fully adaptable
#50Criticism: Cmd+left/right/up/down doesn't work - instant dealbreaker.
Getting keyboard navigation reasonably right everywhere will be very difficult. Ironing out the remaining platform differences may be even more difficult.
I also broke it (a nondescript TypeError once, “invariant broken” another time) fairly quickly, by tabbing to the cog thing, Space, tab to the Duplicate button, Space—where clicking didn’t achieve that.