Freeman Dyson Has Died

I think that everything is the light with different levels form of concentration. High concentration of the light transforms to physics matter. Low level of the light is vacuum, high is atomic energy, Large Hadron Collider for example. The light is universal transmitter & transformer. The light is concentrated knowledge that is transmitted from the sun to every particle of the planet and peoples, and thanks to the light, matter and a variety of life forms are created, which creates a variety of forms of matter. The idea of Christianity about the resurrection of people is magnificent, then such great people as Dyson could be resurrected, why not? But technologies are needed in new physics and medicine, which would gain access to reality at the nanoparticle level. A 3D printer that prints the light and lays knowledge into the light to recreate a person. There is a pattern that the more we get access at the micro level, the more powerful chips we can build, and more powerful chips can calculate more hashes and allow us to bring in new gigantic machines, like telescopes and spaceships, which will give access to new macro-knowledge such as dark matter and black holes of matter-time consensus, which will allow us to create new petabyte flash drives based on light, and new the light based computers will be able to burn information directly to the points of space, and what it means to materialize any object, which will provide access to new knowledge and made new grand chips & telescopes. We already partially use the light in our rooms, networks and cameras and monitors to exchange information. New theories and machines based on the light will allow creating new machines for controlling the space-time continent and copying knowledge from any space-time, and then the task of resurrecting people becomes feasible and we can transfer the consciousness of this particular person from the past without distortion. If this happens in the next 5,000 years, then Dyson saw it right. To create such machines, we need new geniuses with Dyson's light. I'm sure we are know less about physics & light, because we live on single planet in single point of universe and our theories can be expanded when we arrive to new points of universe.

So? Every single wikipedia article on anything controversial is trash. Even things you don't realize are controversial, but a few random people have an emotional investment in. Wikipedia does not require valid citations, most citations on wikipedia don't support the claims made in the articles.

>You? Zero.

I am not writing an encyclopedia article.

>I mean, you can go trawl through the data yourself

I have, which is why I suggested that you try it. Do yourself a favor, watch this 13 minute video, then go look at the data he is referencing and see for yourself that he's correct. Climate hysteria is political, and supposedly trustworthy scientific organizations are engaged in deliberate deception to push lies. https://hooktube.com/watch?v=8455KEDitpU

>Because it's gonna be another bullshit thing, one after another

Like all the climate hysteria predictions made based on these infallible computer models, which have a 0% accuracy rate thus far. The warming has thus far has been insignificant. The effect has been beneficial. CO2 itself is highly beneficial. All claims of disaster are based entirely on speculation. Remember, many Pacific islands were predicted to be GONE by now. They are not. Several are larger. Forgive me if I base my actions on the actual data rather than predictions made by people who have a zero percent success rate.

>Well TBH trolls like you have a net negative effect on the entire discourse and the culture here

Dismissing things you don't want to know about as "trolling" has a net negative effect. If you care about discourse, stop trying to make currently popular fads into religious requirements for talking on a website.

>stop embarrassing yourself and don't bother commenting

How many more decades of failed predictions will it take before you feel embarrassed about your blind repetition of lies about data you never bothered to look at?