Too bad they won't ask about manhole covers anymore. I figured that one out on my own a long, long time ago. (free points!) P.S. If you know why they make them round, then do you know why they don't make them triangular? ;)
Google tries new angle on hiring
11–20 of 69 posts
Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#12Too bad they won't ask about manhole covers anymore. I figured that one out on my own a long, long time ago. (free points!) P.S. If you know why they make them round, then do you know why they don't make them triangular? ;)
I'm pretty sure a triangular one can fall down its hole if tilted properly.
Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#13Still, limiting the number of interviews to 5 or so is at the very least a positive step towards reducing the chance of people meeting someone from what steve yegge calls their "interview anti-loop" (see: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/03/get-that-job-at-goog...; short version - sets of interviewers whose favourite subjects/questions happen to not overlap with your particular specialities, and will therefore have a much dimmer view of your talents than differently focused colleagues).
Also, a problem with many many interviews is it's even harder for a candidate who has been given no significant post-rejection feedback to figure out what needed improvement or where you weren't a good fit; I'm reduced to speculating that maybe number 7 was a bit iffy? Or maybe 4 and 7?
Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#14The interviews were quite challenging (and of increasing difficulty), but there was nothing even resembling a trick question or a mind teaser. I researched a bit before the interviews, and credible results consistently said that Google always had a policy against such questions. I wonder how the head of HR can then talk about it as if they were asking such questions recently?
All in all, the hiring process was challenging and exhausting, but never felt unfair or sloppy/undirected.
Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#15Too bad they won't ask about manhole covers anymore. I figured that one out on my own a long, long time ago. (free points!) P.S. If you know why they make them round, then do you know why they don't make them triangular? ;)
> Because all diameters are the same length, the Reuleaux triangle,
> with all other curves of constant width, is an answer to the question
> "Other than a circle, what shape can you make a manhole cover so that
> it cannot fall down through the hole?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuleaux_triangleRe: Google tries new angle on hiring
#16If I'm perfectly honest, the reason I haven't applied to companies like Google is because their process scares me. I studied at a modest university and achieved a good degree, but the kind of horror stories I hear make me firmly believe that I received a terrible education, because the level of employees they seem to attract (Jon Skeet, anyone?) are a class apart from myself. It didn't help that the university next d…
I've met geniuses who don't make anything interesting out of their lives. They just play mind games and show off. Nobody really likes them or their "high standards." Usually they just criticize everybody and everything in some way or another, instead of helping out. And they are often lazy, covering themselves by stating things are not "challenging" or worthy of their highness.
They remind me of those rich guys with sports cars. They wouldn't win any race. What matters is how you do with what you have. The house of cards of arrogants falls down if enough people just ignore them. Like the typical high school hotness scenario.
My ideal hiring test:
- What do you code for fun?
- How do you help people around you?
- Favorite non-fiction books?
- Would you like to come over for a hackathon next saturday?
Edit: I know one counter-example within Google, though. YMMVRe: Google tries new angle on hiring
#17Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#18"The new approach includes a new “rule of five” that limits the number of interviews a candidate can attend to no more than that number, said Laszlo Bock, head of human resources. In the past, would-be Googlers were often subjected to 12-14 interviews, he added." Wow, they actually consider 5 interviews to be a lean approach to interviewing; no wonder their process is convoluted. Methinks Google seriously needs to re…
Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#19God bless the manhole cover problem. That's been making the rounds for over a decade.
Re: Google tries new angle on hiring
#20God bless the manhole cover problem. That's been making the rounds for over a decade.