Live data from Hacker News

No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

sfchronicle.com

191–200 of 236 posts

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#191
post #51

>His conclusion: When cities shut streets off to cars, people drive less. The myth of a “carmageddon”-style traffic jam is apparently overblown. This seems to completely ignore the fact that what actually has occured here is that the reduction of drivers is a negative for those drivers. Those drivers now either have to cycle or use public transport instead of their cars or have to move. That might seem positive to th…

Well, and the externalities of the driver's carbon emissions are a massive negative impact on all of us. In a city as dense as San Francisco, transit, walking, or biking can easily cover most people's transportation needs. The more we build safe and effective infrastructure for those modes, the more people will use them. And that will be good - in the end - for the remaining few who do absolutely need to drive (thoug…

> Well, and the externalities of the driver's carbon emissions are a massive negative impact on all of us.

This is just one part of it. 40,000 people are killed every year in the US, and over 4 million seriously injured or disabled.

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

San Francisco has a few areas with the "sidewalk level bike lanes", especially near the waterfront from the Embarcadero towards The Marina. I've walked in there as a pedestrian and have ridden a bike in that area, and honestly the area has wide-enough sidewalks that that style of bike lane isn't too bad for pedestrians or cyclists, at least in my opinion. I imagine what's envisioned for Market Street will end up bein…

I"m not a fan of riding a bike at Embarcadero. I would like to see more bike/walk areas like the one on Townsend between 7th and 5th where there is a clearly marked bike only and walking only section.

The last time I rode my bike to the Caltrain, which was admittedly a while ago, everything was being ripped up on 5th near Townsend (I think it was 5th at least -- it was one of the nearby numbered streets); is that all finished now?

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

E-bikes! They're amazing. Bicycle with small assist engine. You start pedaling, and the bike engine helps you, so going up hills is easy. Riding one feels like you have super-strength.

Ebikes still cost way too much. You can get a really great bike for £500. An ebike is going to set you back £1500 or more. I think the price will come down but I don't think they're a great solution yet. Fortunately they don't need to be a great solution. In all but the hilliest places plenty of people will bike if the cycle lanes are there. Loads of people cycle in Bristol despite it being quite hilly and not really…

Why does the difference cost £1000? The electric assist bike conversion kits I see in the US are $300-500. Are the purpose-built ebikes tons better than the conversion kits?

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#194
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Indeed. We have pavement level cycle tracks in the part of East London I live in - I tend to stick to the roads since if if I'm doing 16-18MPH and a pedestrian wanders into the cycleway, it gets tricky. I absolutely do not blame the pedestrians - its all too easy to do.

From the perspective of a pedestrian this always feels like a really bad pattern. The cyclists are going full speed past pedestrians who might only be a foot or so from them because, after all, they're in a marked bike lane. Meanwhile pedestrians are walking on a sidewalk, maybe not paying much attention, and probably not expecting something to slam into them if they moved over a bit or changed their direction at a c…

You can somewhat rectify this by bumping where pedestrians and cyclists are expected to cross between the bus stop and sidewalk, a mini-speed table of sorts: https://bikeportland.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/DSC_0775...

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some of those already exist! At increasing levels of car-like-ness: * https://www.wired.com/gallery/best-electric-cargo-bikes/ * https://www.contemporist.com/5-examples-of-enclosed-bike-des... * https://www.arcimoto.com/ (Studiously ignoring parent's intended snark) In all seriousness, I'm expecting an explosion of these new light vehicle body types in the coming decades, as global trends of cheap electric drive + ba…

"I'm expecting an explosion of these new light vehicle body types in the coming decades, as global trends of cheap electric drive + batteries, increasing urban congestion, and less car-oriented urban planning trends converge" Don't motorcycles already serve that purpose? Its already the chief form of personal transportation in most of the Earth's population. The problem I see with all the concepts you posted is that…

I think you might be underestimating the size of a modern car -- they're huge!

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#196
Translation of the first couple paragraphs: "SF street traffic is already abysmal, and yet we still managed to make it a little bit worse."

Market Street was already pretty devoid of non-bus/taxi traffic before "a month ago". If you want a better test, try closing off Van Ness or Embarcadero and see how well that goes for y'all.

"No carmageddon"? SF is already a carmageddon.

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#197

Chicago tried this decades ago with the State Street Mall project [1]. It turned out to be an overall flop, with stores seeing reduced traffic, and by 1993 it was gone and good riddance. As a pedestrian, I hated it when I worked downtown. Maybe they'll do something on Market Street that will work better, or perhaps it might be a better fit there than in Chicago, but I wish them luck, because they're going to need it.…

The weather in Chicago is markedly worse for being outside for half the year.

Probably more like 10 months. I imagine there's a shoulder season in the spring and fall where Chicago is more desirable, from a weather standpoint, than cool and windy SF, before it gets too hot and humid in Chicago's summer.

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#198
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ebikes still cost way too much. You can get a really great bike for £500. An ebike is going to set you back £1500 or more. I think the price will come down but I don't think they're a great solution yet. Fortunately they don't need to be a great solution. In all but the hilliest places plenty of people will bike if the cycle lanes are there. Loads of people cycle in Bristol despite it being quite hilly and not really…

Why does the difference cost £1000? The electric assist bike conversion kits I see in the US are $300-500. Are the purpose-built ebikes tons better than the conversion kits?

Because it's not an honest comparison. A £500 bike is still a relatively budget adult bike, and an ebike is a relatively luxury product still and is probably more comparable to a £1,000 normal bike.

Decathlon (giant French sports chain) sell an ebike for £650.

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#199
post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I'm expecting an explosion of these new light vehicle body types in the coming decades, as global trends of cheap electric drive + batteries, increasing urban congestion, and less car-oriented urban planning trends converge" Don't motorcycles already serve that purpose? Its already the chief form of personal transportation in most of the Earth's population. The problem I see with all the concepts you posted is that…

I think you might be underestimating the size of a modern car -- they're huge !

By small car I meant Smart ForTwo, or Fiat 500. These not-a-car trikes/quads have comparable footprint to these cars. Which isn't small enough to fit in-between 2 lanes.

Re: No ‘carmageddon’ on auto-free Market Street: study shows bikes and buses benefit

#200
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Of course, that makes car use more attractive again.

Yep. Physicists laugh at economists, but this is the same underlying structure that explains how even though everything we use is now more energy efficient, we use more energy overall.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN