CSS art always reminds me to the acid tests, back in the old days. We come from far! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acid2
Those tests were definitely fun, and gave me lots of "my browser is better than yours" bragging rights. I'm surprised that it's the year 2020 and Firefox still doesn't score 100% in the Acid3 test.
The Simpsons in CSS
11–20 of 105 posts
Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#12Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#13I was wondering why I suddenly had an influx of Twitter followers this morning... Thanks to whoever shared this.
https://www.chrispattle.com/blog/simpsons-in-css/
You're using the cert for octopushr.app... Unfortunately port 80 is also closed, so even the most recent wayback machine wasn't working. Here's a link from 2016 which goes into your methods, which honestly, are a bit on the sparse side (it doesn't detract at all from what you've done):
https://web.archive.org/web/20160111044359/https://www.chris...
Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#14Some of these do not seem to render correctly on Firefox. Seems to rely on Chrome-specific behavior.
Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#15Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#16Some of these do not seem to render correctly on Firefox. Seems to rely on Chrome-specific behavior.
Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#17Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#18Not being a fan of CSS, I think this (the CSS source code) shows fairly well why I'm not a fan of CSS.
Sure, doing things like this is not what CSS is meant for.
CSS is meant for making HTML do things it wasn't meant for.
Re: The Simpsons in CSS
#19Viewing this page with Dark Reader enabled makes for quite a harrowing experience... https://i.imgur.com/AUTXPfW.png