Regardless of whether you believe in them, I think the longevity of religious organizations points the way towards how the human race can plan and advance with projects that cannot be completed in a single lifetime. Projects that require a vision beyond 10 years, much less 20, are exceedingly rare. Very, very few companies last more than a generation or two. This map in the article might make it seem like there are l…
Isn't this just survivorship bias? There are many churches, many splits and many died out along the way and your only looking at the few that survived and became dominant. There aren't a lot (if any) of roman, Greek, Norse institutions still around and even within Christianity I don't think there are any Lollard or Cathar ones.
Also, there's a simple explanation which almost bothers me to point out because I think anyone with any sense of the greater good would see it immediately even if they were not faithful themselves; 'Religious' folks at least of the common era, tend to have faith in something much greater, and enduring than themselves, and so the 'hard work' they might put into building the Cathedral at Koln which took like 700 years makes easy sense, because it's there for future generations to see, be inspired by, enjoy the fruits of. That's not exactly a 'benefit' to someone who wants to be 'rich now', but it's a benefit to those who believe in the future. Although I guess there's still an ego play whereby some people think they can project their fame well into the future no doubt.
And FYI there really were not that-that many competing religions post-common era.
Note how 'bar' and/or 'brewery' (and eatery) tends to be the other 'longest lived'.
Well, every town needs a pub, the one already there is probably good enough. A pub isn't going to attract the competitive afflictions of the nobility or be destroyed by a conquering dude bent on making sure there's no uprising. They're almost the 'original brand' as well. Finally, some of them were taken on by Monks (thank you Belgium!) which gives them another bit of longevity consistency.
The other entity not mentioned are noble households. Queen Elizabeth is actually a descendant of pre-Norman kings even. I think it's actually direct (though not direct of all precedent kings as there was some bouncing around, but all around the same rough lineage). I don't know off the top of my head the true antiquity of some households, but it's pretty far back in many cases.
To me the map also hints that successful civilisations have a lot of consistency and continuity ....