Live data from Hacker News

China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

ctvnews.ca

11–20 of 131 posts

Re: China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

#11
It can be banned, sure, but I don't see the superstitious side of the consumption being curtailed.

When you have a market for rare 'natural wondercures' being sought out, it only takes one mutation in a virus to spread on from another mammal to humans, add to that China's population density. A recipe for disaster.

Re: China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

#14
post #9
post #5

"prohibiting the illegal wildlife trade" This site is in bad need for a proofreader...

If what you mean is those words are lengthy and repeated, that's actually how chinese officials talk and write.

I believe they mean that prohibiting something that is illegal is unnecessary.

Re: China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

#16
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

China has a population density only 4 times the density of the US and half the one of Germany. It has a vast amount of wildlife. Why wouldn't they have any wild animals left?

Because they're even endangering animals in other countries and continents, so why not their own as well?

Everyone is endangering animals in other countries. And when it comes to preserving their own wild animals, china is much better at it than europe who wiped out pretty much all their major fauna. The US isn't much better since we pretty much wiped out most of our native wild life.

Re: China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

#17
post #11

It can be banned, sure, but I don't see the superstitious side of the consumption being curtailed. When you have a market for rare 'natural wondercures' being sought out, it only takes one mutation in a virus to spread on from another mammal to humans, add to that China's population density. A recipe for disaster.

You really think people in China haven’t been scared out of doing risky things like eating wild animals?

Re: China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

#18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because they're even endangering animals in other countries and continents, so why not their own as well?

Everyone is endangering animals in other countries. And when it comes to preserving their own wild animals, china is much better at it than europe who wiped out pretty much all their major fauna. The US isn't much better since we pretty much wiped out most of our native wild life.

China came first in the extinction of marine mammals with Baiji. US is figthing hard in a close position for the second place, with Chinese help.

There is not anymore "our" animals and "your" animals. Pangolin is not a Chinese animal, neither Totoba.

Re: China bans consumption and trade of wild animals

#19
post #11

It can be banned, sure, but I don't see the superstitious side of the consumption being curtailed. When you have a market for rare 'natural wondercures' being sought out, it only takes one mutation in a virus to spread on from another mammal to humans, add to that China's population density. A recipe for disaster.

You really think people in China haven’t been scared out of doing risky things like eating wild animals?

bilekas is probably thinking of the trade in things like poached ivory, rhino and tiger parts, where being banned on paper has not eliminated the black market.
Post reply on HN