Live data from Hacker News

Where Sci-Hub Is

whereisscihub.now.sh

31–40 of 185 posts

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#31

The Wikipedia article is also kept reasonably up to date with the URLs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub They used to have a .onion address, which I assumed would continue to be the most reliable way in, but it's been down for a long time. I'm surprised, it seems like Tor would be the best way to remain up and accessible.

Judging by https://gitlab.com/Flockademic/whereisscihub/-/blob/master/i... it is vice versa — whereisscihub is reading URLs list from Wikipedia.

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#32
As academics, your institution is paying publishers to get access to journal (and you may loose access to electronic versions if the institution stops paying contrary to paper versions), you write papers for free, you review papers for free, you are part of the editorial board of the journal for free (or some crumbs for travelling to a conference), as an editor you spend most of your life managing people for a really small stipend compared to the time spent. People still do it because they believe it is useful. But current openaccess solutions that cost sometimes $5,000 are not a solution either. In both options the publishers is making the money and the researchers or their institution have to pay... There are legitimate concerns about scihub from some librarians as it doesn't allow a correct attribution of funds to ressources that are needed by researchers and there are some concerns of researchers credentials being stolen and shared (willingly and not) by scihub but also less reputable actors. University libraries are struggling with credentials reuse as they are the ones that get punished by the publishers with ban of ips or full institutions and harder contracts negotiations. Talking about those negotiations, they are all confidential, despite often using state or federal funds there is no way to know how much, what and how these secret deals are negotiated. So we still don't have a good solution. Preprints are useful, but we had already too many publications to skim through and the fact that anybody can publish anything with no filters makes finding meaningful information much harder....

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#33
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are no issues with the platform ( https://zeit-status.co/ ). The deploy has been blocked due to ToS violations.

What terms? Edit: I didn’t know Sci-Hub was illegal.

https://zeit.co/terms

> You shall not... (b) use the Service in any unlawful manner (including without limitation in violation of any data, privacy or export control laws

> This TOS shall be governed by the laws of the State of California without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#34
post #10

Oh no! I'm seeing it down. https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/whereisscihub.now.sh Sending HugOps to everyone at Zeit trying to keep 99.99% uptime for now.sh at a time like this

[deleted]

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#38
post #36

HTTP 451. I never thought I'd see one of those before. I live in Canada... Not some authoritarian dictatorship. Wonder who blocked it.

I thought that HTTP error code was the joke...

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#39

The Wikipedia article is also kept reasonably up to date with the URLs: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub They used to have a .onion address, which I assumed would continue to be the most reliable way in, but it's been down for a long time. I'm surprised, it seems like Tor would be the best way to remain up and accessible.

DNS-over-Wikipedia is my goto strategy for websites like this (Scihub, Libgen, Piratebay, Popcorn Time, etc.).

Re: Where Sci-Hub Is

#40
post #19
post #10

Oh no! I'm seeing it down. https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/whereisscihub.now.sh Sending HugOps to everyone at Zeit trying to keep 99.99% uptime for now.sh at a time like this

There are no issues with the platform ( https://zeit-status.co/ ). The deploy has been blocked due to ToS violations.

The page was using zeit 1.0 before, which means it was a container and not a serverless function. (I know you know Rauchg, just explaining for other people). This container was actually failing because of rate limiting by wikidata causing an unhandled promise failure.

I had made a fork of this to show it working on zeit now 2.0 with 'stale-while-revalidate' so that it only update once every minute. But obviously I took that fork down once I saw this comment.

Post reply on HN