Earlier quoted context omitted.
But for an entity like the EU they could have complete control over the lot, with relative ease. The client, server and protocol are all open.
Is the server really open? I was under the impression that it was not. That's my only issue with Signal honestly, you can't rehost/fork easily if you're unhappy with the way the project is going.
EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
171–180 of 289 posts
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#172This is a mistake. They should at least compile their own version and not something that comes from an US based app store under US law. At any point the US can force a change. This is as secure as purchasing a machine from Crypto AG. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#173The EU budget is 148 Billion Euros. Surely, if they have a requirement for a secure communication app, they have the wherewithal to build one for their needs, that EU citizens and others could then use if they so chose? Essential knowledge is definitely public. This is not about 'Signal' it's about why governments can't/won't deliver on so many issues they themselves deem to be very materially important to them, part…
EU projects are often a bit of a mess; design by committee taken to the extreme, with each committee member being a nation.
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#174This is a mistake. They should at least compile their own version and not something that comes from an US based app store under US law. At any point the US can force a change. This is as secure as purchasing a machine from Crypto AG. [1] [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG
The OS is US based too and they could easily keylog everything. Even if you wipe out the OS for a self-compiled one, there are blobs running full blown OS in the hardware and it has access to every single hardware resource, good luck getting rid of that one without building your own hardware and drivers from scratch.
For an individual that is obviously infeasible. For the continent of Europe as a whole, it obviously isn't. Why shouldn't they put some money into developing cellphone hardware with open source drivers?
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
Giving this advice has almost no cost and, at least arguably, it is better for staff to use Signal than other messengers. So, IMHO, this is good advice.
Not if the staff is lured by all the E2EE promises and all the lock icons to overestimate the security of the app and share more information than they would otherwise.
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will link to this each and every time this comes up: https://signal.org/bigbrother/eastern-virginia-grand-jury/ Signal turned over everything they had on this user (which was two time stamps: user creation and last access), and fought the gag order to be able to publish the subpoena and the response. Signal would have to be pretty stupid to lie to a federal court. Think what you want, but Signal doesn’t have any me…
If I worked for the intelligence agencies I would be capturing all the info going in and out of the signal servers at the infrastructure level. Even if I couldn't break the encryption I'd have timing and connectivity data. So, if I were a user, I would always operate on the assumption that info would leak.
Getting people to use Tor for everything is hard enough, good luck getting people to use stuff even more obscure.
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#177Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why reinvent the wheel? Signal does the job, doesn't store data, not even metadata, and can be used immediately.
> doesn't store data, not even metadata Isn't that just a promise? Also, even then, it is based on your contacts, which are seen by google.
Your phone number is sent to Signal's servers during sign-up and it uses the conventional SMS service to "close the loop" and prove this number is under your control. Having signed up you can use a PIN to lock the number to you so that anyone without that PIN can't do the "new phone" dance (this expires if you stop answering PIN questions correctly)
If you choose to do so a digest of your contact's phone numbers can be sent to Signal for them to match against the set of (also digested) numbers of Signal users so they can tell you who has Signal enabled.
Whether you choose to give your contacts to Google, to Facebook, to Apple or whoever is up to you and outside Signal's control.
Signal does let you create an encrypted profile, and then your device can tell other people's devices the keys to look at the profile if you want to allow that. You don't have to use a profile or trust anybody else if you don't want to. Signal doesn't learn the keys (unless I guess you deliberately sent them those keys) so they can't read the profile.
Unlike many of its competitors Signal's messages can't be read by Signal, in most cases this includes who sent them (Signal's "Sealed Sender" means in most cases if you correspond with someone the indication of who sent them a message will be encrypted such that they can tell you sent it but Signal only knows it was someone they authorised to send them messages). When you attach images Signal avoids learning how large the images are exactly, and if you use a service like GIPHY to add typical meme images like Stephen Colbert eating popcorn Signal double-proxies this so that they don't learn which GIF you used, and GIPHY doesn't learn who used it.
Edit: Fixed name of GIPHY. Huh.
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#178Earlier quoted context omitted.
But for an entity like the EU they could have complete control over the lot, with relative ease. The client, server and protocol are all open.
Is the server really open? I was under the impression that it was not. That's my only issue with Signal honestly, you can't rehost/fork easily if you're unhappy with the way the project is going.
But the code is right there for you to read it and re-use it, you just won't get far building your own network with one user and demanding everybody else switch over.
Re: EU Commission to staff: Switch to Signal messaging app
#179why is there no european company the size of whatsapp, facebook, apple and so on?
good luck competing with 0% tax state-sponsored companies without venture capital. The same reason there is no european huawei. There are some medium sized companies, but they don't have the same advantages as those in the US or China