Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a descriptive matter, yes. But from an interpersonal perspective, it is the raw material of a large change. Like a lot of tech, it favors those already in a powerful position. If you make it cheaper and easier for a nosy boss to be nosy, they will be nosier. Cops will have a field day figuring out exactly how far courts will let them push things. And so on. The potential for surreptitious sampling also opens up ne…
But if you make it cheaper, then that tilts the balance slightly toward the less well off! Not saying it's any thing equal, but imagine being able to 'get dirt' on those in power easily.
People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
11–20 of 35 posts
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#12The problem I see is that lawmakers and law enforcement want these to be taken as the gospel truth when obtained and provided as evidence in a court of law, while the judges or juries are usually not competent enough to understand the nuances and question the “evidence” to the extent necessary to not sentence an innocent person.
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#13https://outline.com/qJvRN6
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#14As I am wont to say, privacy in meatspace is dead. Or at least, getting deader every day.
Edit: And so this is another advantage of working remotely. In particular, as a consultant.
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#15Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#16https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DSI9-D...
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#17There's more to it than that. So basically you get a MS profile for each GC peak. But there are various ways to do MS. Some mainly give you masses of intact molecules, after ~gentle ionization. But some also give you masses of fragments, and that distinguishes among molecules with similar masses.
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree. If these devices were free they would still increase the power divide between those who can wield force and those who can’t. Maybe even more so.
Exactly. These things are more often a force multiplier than an equalizer.
Now, it's a lot less.
That is to say, n/∞ << n/x.
Re: People leave molecular wakes that may give away their secrets
#19They all sit on a large surface, and represent different types of fluids. One might represent the insides of your cells, another represents your blood. Another might represent the stomach, or another part of the digestive system, etc.
You have an input pot that represents what you eat, and that's the only one you can actually put ingredients in, and each pot cooks things in a different way. Your body is like a chef trying to keep the "cell soup" pot tasty, but it can only swap ladles of stuff between ajacent pots, mostly at random.
On the one hand it seems like a big mess, but on the other it feels like it has some sort of usefulness.
There really is a huge amount of chaos happening, and molecules are just kind of bouncing around and migrating randomly between regions. Using this soup-random model, it's easy to understand the wake we leave behind, as what is being spilled as things move around.