Raising $100M in debt is the same as borrowing $100M, right?
DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
11–20 of 289 posts
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#12Raising $100M in debt is the same as borrowing $100M, right?
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#13What is their current valuation? I wondered if google or microsoft would buy them, amazon can't due to anti-trust issues, but the others might be able to.
I don’t see why they would except maybe to aquihire some talent.
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#14DigitalOcean has raised a total of $305.4M in funding over 11 rounds. Their latest funding was raised on Dec 27, 2018 from a Secondary Market round. [1] [1] https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/digitalocean#section...
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#151. Using the word “raise” when talking about financing via debt seems inappropriate and very start-upy. This is a low cost of capital line of credit, is it not (due to their infrastructure and broad customer base)?
2. Why in the world are statements like this not met with scorn? “... scale to $1 billion in revenue in the next five years, and it will become free cash flow profitable (something the CEO also referred to, loosely, as profitability) in the next two.“
On point #2 - thats NOT profitability. Thats called “Cash Flow Positive”, and its an incredible achievement, but definitions matter. In my opinion, “cash flow profitable” isn’t a real thing (its “cash flow positive”), but the real issue is - cash flow positive ≠ profitability.
Edit: On why definitions matter, recall WeWork “Community Adjusted EBITDA”.
Edit #2: The Author knows that the CEO is making stuff up, which is why this bothers me. It’s evident by the parenthetical disclaimer, “...(something the CEO also referred to, loosely, as profitability)”.... Then call the CEO out, Alex Wilhelm (author), if you think its BS!
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#16What is their current valuation? I wondered if google or microsoft would buy them, amazon can't due to anti-trust issues, but the others might be able to.
Anyone with tech chops has their own cloud, and DO isn’t even cash flow positive yet. Thoughts and prayers to anyone with common stock (which isn’t looking too good at an exit).
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#17This article had more detail and substance than I usually find on TechCrunch or startup coverage in general. I do want to point out two things that bothered me in the article: 1. Using the word “raise” when talking about financing via debt seems inappropriate and very start-upy. This is a low cost of capital line of credit, is it not (due to their infrastructure and broad customer base)? 2. Why in the world are state…
You can be making money and paying it all to Uncle Sam and your bank loans. 100 million is gonna be a lot of interest payments.
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#18Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#19Raising $100M in debt is the same as borrowing $100M, right?
Edit - read it closer, it seems they are borrowing from commercial lenders. In which case I have no idea why they used the word 'raised', as it usually implies bond sales.
Re: DigitalOcean raises $100M in debt as it scales toward revenue of $300M
#20Raising $100M in debt is the same as borrowing $100M, right?
Those are two ways to phrase the same thought, yes, but there are things about raising corporate debt which don't necessarily line up 1:1 with expectations consumers might have about borrowing money. One example, which is de rigeur for raising debt via bond issuance or for very large loans from banks, is "covenants" (restrictions on your future behavior for the duration the debt is in place), which may foreclose your…
'default' means 'pay us back now or give us your collateral', right?