Live data from Hacker News

Google Fonts Analytics

fonts.google.com

21–30 of 191 posts

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#21
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If google embedded the top fonts in the browser this wouldn’t be an issue. I don’t understand why the font selection in browsers is so limited.

Practically there's no difference between a browser that lazily downloads builtin fonts, and a global URL for a font file across websites with an extremely long TTL. And you don't want the browsers to be even more bloated than they already are!

Then why are there 36 trillion requests?

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#22
Does anyone know whether this service generates any revenue for Google? I can’t see selling fonts data as something desirable by 3rd party companies but maybe that’s just me?

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#25
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Loading fonts is tracking and data collection. It's what Google does. If they build the fonts into the browser, then tracking/data collections calls are not made.

They could embed it in Chrome. If someone is using Chrome, google doesn't need any more points of data. They know everything you do.

yeah but you can sort of opt out of tracking by chrome, so its best to have fallbacks to be able to track all the things!

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#26
post #21
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Practically there's no difference between a browser that lazily downloads builtin fonts, and a global URL for a font file across websites with an extremely long TTL. And you don't want the browsers to be even more bloated than they already are!

Then why are there 36 trillion requests?

A lot of people using a lot of fonts from a lot of different browsers. I'm sure the caching techniques aren't perfect but they're probably quite good.

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#27
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Font selection in browsers isn't limited. Browsers don't have embedded fonts—they rely on whatever fonts are installed in the operating system. The challenge is that to ensure consistency, you need to use the "lowest common denominator" of fonts that are installed by default across all operating systems . Which leaves you with (like) Arial, Times, Courier, Verdana, Georgia, Palatino, and (hahahaha) Comic Sans. The re…

I think what they mean is why don't browsers just include the most popular fonts, so the underlying OS doesn't matter? Instead we're restricted to only a few fonts that actually have decent cross platform support.

The only way to do that would be to include particular typefaces as part of the CSS specification, rather than just the generic font-family keywords like “sans-serif” and “monospaced”. But who should pick them, which ones would they pick, and how would they be licensed?

It’s kind of the same problem as saying that the browser should include common images. Which images? Why? How many?

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#29
post #3

Yeah, 36 trillion requests slowing down the loading of websites. Way, unnecessarily, overused.

The sterile world you desire is not one I'd like to live in.

It's like my desire for quality CLI apps and APIs before any sort of fancy schmancy GUI. The important part is reminding one's self that the other 99% of people want and need the GUI version of the app.

Re: Google Fonts Analytics

#30
I was part of the team that founded this, about 10 years ago if memory serves. I'm still loosely involved, though no longer at Google. Inconsolata was one of the 20 fonts for the original launch, and we're now in the process of launching it as a variable font, with both width and weight axes. I'm also getting funding from them for Rust-based font tools.

Feel free to AMA, though no guarantees I'll have good answers.

Post reply on HN