Live data from Hacker News

Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

theregister.co.uk

41–50 of 114 posts

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#41

If this sale is successfully prevented, the next step needs to be to identify and purge ISOC and ICANN of anyone who negotiated or advocated for this deal. Not just because of the corruption issue, but the pure lack of good judgment. I keep thinking about the fact that first, ICANN was freed of it's tie to the US government, and since then, it's been business deal after business deal to corrupt the domain system.

So a purge isn't sufficient. Any lasting change would require a complete restructuring of the organizations in question.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#42

If this sale is successfully prevented, the next step needs to be to identify and purge ISOC and ICANN of anyone who negotiated or advocated for this deal. Not just because of the corruption issue, but the pure lack of good judgment. I keep thinking about the fact that first, ICANN was freed of it's tie to the US government, and since then, it's been business deal after business deal to corrupt the domain system.

We shouldn't be surprised. The whole TLD debacle has been a bit cash grab, which hasn't been beneficial to anyone but a few. Take the subsequent acquired domain of ".dev" by Google for instance, which then reserved it for internal usage only.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#43
post #42

If this sale is successfully prevented, the next step needs to be to identify and purge ISOC and ICANN of anyone who negotiated or advocated for this deal. Not just because of the corruption issue, but the pure lack of good judgment. I keep thinking about the fact that first, ICANN was freed of it's tie to the US government, and since then, it's been business deal after business deal to corrupt the domain system.

We shouldn't be surprised. The whole TLD debacle has been a bit cash grab, which hasn't been beneficial to anyone but a few. Take the subsequent acquired domain of ".dev" by Google for instance, which then reserved it for internal usage only.

.dev is available for public registration... I have one.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#44
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What happens when Ethos starts running their own mining software (or bribes existing miners) in order to jack up prices for .org?

In Handshake, rather than renting your domain from .org or .com, you own your tld. This means that nobody will be able to charge you for using your own name. No more rent seeking or getting taxed by a pseudo government of the internet.

> In Handshake, rather than renting your domain from .org or .com, you own your tld.

Given the conversation we had on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22312014, I think this claim is leaving out a lot of information. Handshake is not optimized for ordinary people to buy TLDs the same way they buy .com domains.

- There's no market information I can find about what a TLD will cost on average.

- Purchasing a TLD will take at least 5 days at a minimum, with no guarantee that you're going to get the TLD at the end.

- Auctions are blind, so you have almost no guarantees at all -- you'll just have to guess what the market value is.

- The intention is still for TLD owners to be able to sell access to subdomains, which will enable the exact same rent seeking and exploitation. The only difference is that there'll be no regulation on the rent seekers.

- Given that subdomains allow us to repeat names (myname.com vs myname.org vs myname.io), having one TLD system is going to be a decrease in the number of available domains, not an increase. The increase comes from the fact that we'll have a ton of TLDs and people will rent subdomains on them (see above).

That's not to say Handshake might not still be a good idea in the sense that it increases competition overall, but I think it's borderline deceptive to say that everyone is just going to own a TLD. Registering a TLD in Handshake may end up being significantly more complicated and significantly more costly than buying a .org domain today -- especially once the good names get used up and new users are effectively forced to rent from existing owners or compete in blind auctions over much more limited resources.

I'm a little bit irritated at this comment, because I've followed Handshake for a while and it's been really hard to get concise, clear information about how it works, even from the main project website. People don't understand the product being offered, and Handshake advocates keep posting very vague statements about how problems are just 'solved'. And whenever I dig into those claims and try to find out how they're solved, I find out that the implementation details aren't as clear cut.

I want a project like Handshake to succeed, but y'all need to be a lot more up-front about the tradeoffs.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#45
post #42

If this sale is successfully prevented, the next step needs to be to identify and purge ISOC and ICANN of anyone who negotiated or advocated for this deal. Not just because of the corruption issue, but the pure lack of good judgment. I keep thinking about the fact that first, ICANN was freed of it's tie to the US government, and since then, it's been business deal after business deal to corrupt the domain system.

We shouldn't be surprised. The whole TLD debacle has been a bit cash grab, which hasn't been beneficial to anyone but a few. Take the subsequent acquired domain of ".dev" by Google for instance, which then reserved it for internal usage only.

Well, I will say this about the TLD "debacle", when I recently went looking for a domain name made out of real words, but not in what you'd call the "A list" (i.e., not "drugs.com" or "money.com"), they have at least made it ineffectual now for squatters to squat on everything across all the useful TLDs. Someone wanted a couple $K for the .com variant but there were several other useful variants completely unregistered.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#46
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the advantage of having human-memorable TLDs that are taken by whoever got in on the cryptocurrency early (I see from your list that names like "uwmadison" and "twentyfirstcenturyfox" are taken already, I don't suppose those are from the actual owners of those trademarks) and therefore your TLD generally isn't related to the name humans know you by, over using public-key-derived addresses like .onion?

The majority of internet traffic goes to the top sites in the world [1]. To address these concerns, Handshake actually allows the top 100k ranked Alexa sites to claim their tld on Handshake with a DNSSEC ownership proof [2]. Finally, everyone’s domains from the existing legacy system will also continue to resolve. [1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/265770/most-popular-us-w... [2] https://hsd-dev.org/guides/claim…

Why don't we simply petition the Internet Society to hold prices fixed for all existing .org domains in the Alexa top 100K? That should be a small part of the potential profits of running .org, and anyone else can just register a domain name on .party or whatever. That way we avoid the cost of a transition to a new system.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#47
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah, so the owner of .org in Handshake is completely unbound by any rules or regulations, and can charge whatever they want for any domains beneath it? Isn't that the entire problem of the .org sale -- the wanna-be new owners want to buy it and then rent-seek on it?

Since TLD ownership will no longer be difficult (ICANN forces a 185k non refundable application fee just to see if you are eligible with no guarantees), people will have alternatives to .org, should .org continue to do what the people don’t want. The current ICANN system is essentially a monopoly that can raise prices to double revenue without paying mind to what the people of the internet have commented.

I can already migrate from .org to .com or other alternatives today. It's just that all of my links will break, my search engine placement will plummet, and users won't be able to find my site. If I'm using my domain as an identity indicator for email, it also opens the door for other people to impersonate me.

The problem with the current system isn't that there aren't enough TLDs. There are tons of TLDs. The problem is that once you register a domain, you need to have permanent ownership of that domain. It doesn't matter if there are 5 thousand (or even 5 million) TLDs. Once I link a .com domain to my email, the .com owner has a monopoly over me.

Handshake doesn't solve that problem. TLD owners will still be able to rent-seek, and they'll still hold monopolies over anyone who buys from them.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#48
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We shouldn't be surprised. The whole TLD debacle has been a bit cash grab, which hasn't been beneficial to anyone but a few. Take the subsequent acquired domain of ".dev" by Google for instance, which then reserved it for internal usage only.

.dev is available for public registration... I have one.

Ditto.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#49
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What happens when Ethos starts running their own mining software (or bribes existing miners) in order to jack up prices for .org?

In Handshake, rather than renting your domain from .org or .com, you own your tld. This means that nobody will be able to charge you for using your own name. No more rent seeking or getting taxed by a pseudo government of the internet.

Why should I believe that miners won't just rent-seek by gouging me with transaction fees when I try to renew my name? Unlike ICANN, I can't exactly sue miners for bad behavior.

Re: Internet Society told to halt .org sale by its own advisory council

#50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In Handshake, rather than renting your domain from .org or .com, you own your tld. This means that nobody will be able to charge you for using your own name. No more rent seeking or getting taxed by a pseudo government of the internet.

> In Handshake, rather than renting your domain from .org or .com, you own your tld. Given the conversation we had on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22312014 , I think this claim is leaving out a lot of information. Handshake is not optimized for ordinary people to buy TLDs the same way they buy .com domains. - There's no market information I can find about what a TLD will cost on average. - Purchasing a TLD wi…

> Registering a TLD in Handshake may end up being significantly more complicated and significantly more costly than buying a .org domain today

It’s significantly easier than the process is today. It’s very hard to get a TLD from ICANN as the process consists of a non refundable application fee of 185k with no guarantees you’ll be approved.

> There's no market information I can find about what a TLD will cost on average.

Rather than artificial set costs, the market will dictate this.

> The intention is still for TLD owners to be able to sell access to subdomains, which will enable the exact same rent seeking and exploitation.

People can either register their own TLDs or choose one owned by someone who doesn’t want to gouge people.

> Auctions are blind, so you have almost no guarantees at all -- you'll just have to guess what the market value is.

Yes, and every bidder will have to be serious about wanting to win a domain instead of squatting every last domain.

I appreciate your comments, and understand your concerns. I would be irritated too if I couldn’t find information about how this worked. Unfortunately, all the details (like Bitcoin was at the beginning) are buried in technical papers and developer docs. Luckily, Handshake is a community owned, community run project, and comments like yours help to propel the project forward and bring the explanation that people deserve.

Thank you for your help and questions, and please keep them coming!

Post reply on HN