Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is the 1971 context, for this millenial's benefit?
Being different was itself weird back then, while it's almost normal now. Being long haired and stoned and consciousness oriented, among short haired short sleeved pocket protected engineering units was especially weird. "Freak" would have been the title editor's attempt to put a particular image of hippiness into a reader's head, justified or not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freak_scene
Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
71–80 of 116 posts
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#72> Eyles and some of his fellow Consciousness IIIers regard computer programming as a fine craft that might some day be elevated to the status of an art. “It’s possible to envision a time when there are professors of the literature of computer programming. Maybe some programmers will be minor poets of the 20th Century. The trouble is that programs are written in a language there’s no audience for. It’s like Nabokov’s…
> a steaming pile of JavaScript a single Alt-Tab away on my laptop Most of the poetry written in Shakespere's time has been lost to history because it was utter drivel. Some is still scratched on 400-year-old walls.
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#73that ride to the moon seems to have been quite a rough one - at each mission it needed some hero who had to save the mission...
Ultimately, that's what made them stop: somebody (or most likely, three somebodies) was going to get killed.
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#74Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is it? Why should it be? What's so hard about understanding somebody's desire for their art to be in the world without violating the boundary between that and their personal life?
It is difficult for many people. Whenever I read about W, I see people offended there was (what they consider) an overreaction, and that everything was deleted. Personally I only see that as exerting extreme caution after something really bad happened. Beyond that, it is their right to share or stop sharing when it stops being fun. People seem to have forgotten the old hacker ethos: doing stuff for fun. Many people a…
I mean, he did write some widely used open source. I think the most popular yaml parser? And an html parser or generator or something that some people were still using but most already moved to another one inspired by it? And there was a community around projects like Camping and Shoes?
So less-involved people judged him like they judged the left-pad guy (which, I mean, was in his full right to remove all his code from npm, but was a bit unkind to the vast community of left-pad dependent day-job developers).
But almost everything he did was 99% art, and his persona shared a lot of things you might not want your boss or mom to read, so I think he should be judged more like Kafka requesting his books to be burned.
Camping and Shoes were also 99% art, and I think nobody who was actively part of their communities was very much hurt and the sentiment in their communities was more of worrying for his well being.
But he let it be known that he's ok and just wanted to quit so they just let him be.
The outrage was mostly from people reading "popular open source developer deletes his github and vanishes" without context.
And yeah, when I was 16 I used to post on HN and for some stupid reason all my comments began with "Hi, I'm " and it's the most embarrassing thing ever, and Google will never forget...
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#75So what happened to the optimism for the "consciousness III society"? Maybe it was naive but It's a shame we don't have that same forward looking feeling today.
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
> there was a sense that extinction could come simply from a single random error Agreed, I was there and watched the "Duck and Cover" films in school. That only stopped when leaders realized that surviving the initial blast was one thing, and surviving a month later for most urbanites was unlikely. > So, through things like the Moral Majority and the efforts of Thatcher and Reagan ... happiness and satisfaction comes…
Whose side was Reagan on? He certainly wasn't on the side of a lot of gays, blacks, or the other minorities his administration threw in jail, poisoned, or just let die through inaction.
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#77I'm not sute if I'll get much sympathy but I would SO much rather get a synopsis with maybe a couple bullet points and some relevant pictures (or graphs!) than an article. Let articles die. I just want to know what happened. I don't want to read the history or a flowery introduction. They just hide the point. This is why I believe reddit2 will use either an AI or the emergent intelligence of thousands of redditors to…
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#78I'm not sute if I'll get much sympathy but I would SO much rather get a synopsis with maybe a couple bullet points and some relevant pictures (or graphs!) than an article. Let articles die. I just want to know what happened. I don't want to read the history or a flowery introduction. They just hide the point. This is why I believe reddit2 will use either an AI or the emergent intelligence of thousands of redditors to…
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#79I'm not sute if I'll get much sympathy but I would SO much rather get a synopsis with maybe a couple bullet points and some relevant pictures (or graphs!) than an article. Let articles die. I just want to know what happened. I don't want to read the history or a flowery introduction. They just hide the point. This is why I believe reddit2 will use either an AI or the emergent intelligence of thousands of redditors to…
And we should replace all of our meals with Soylent!
Re: Weird-Looking Freak Saves Apollo 14 (1971)
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
As far as I understand, he quit his public life when someone hunted down and published his real name and address. He removed his website and github, which contained his various writings, some of which had names with "tutorial" or "guide" in them but all of which were at least 80% works of literature and at most 20% works of technical documentation. Not sure I would call it "ragequitting". Virtually all his works were…
> Not sure I would call it "ragequitting". Expecting to maintain a large public reputation and stay anonymous and then stopping when the facade is cracked is pretty unrealistic.